Stadium.

All things related to the Castleford Tigers.
User avatar
yorky
Verified
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 4843
Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 18:50
Location: York, UK
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by yorky » 01 Nov 2024, 15:52

exactly!!

User avatar
Robbo
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 574
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:56
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by Robbo » 04 Nov 2024, 07:16

casjunction wrote: 31 Oct 2024, 16:10 Is that Robbo being his usual happy optimistic self.?
ROBBO
Is delighted that Martin has taken control. Finally moved on the from the people who have tried to destroy this club.

However the "shed cycle" has gone for now.
Truth is always best !

tigerfeat
Grand Final Winner
Grand Final Winner
Posts: 15016
Joined: 23 Jun 2014, 12:07
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by tigerfeat » 04 Nov 2024, 10:34

I'm no great fan of IF by any means but do you really think he was trying to destroy the club ?
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi

User avatar
yorky
Verified
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 4843
Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 18:50
Location: York, UK
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by yorky » 04 Nov 2024, 10:50

the problem was, as his dad Jack said "we are surviving not thriving" & that was our problem, we were going backwards / stagnant, lets hope MJ has got us improving?

St Albans tiger
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 530
Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 13:04

Re: Stadium.

Post by St Albans tiger » 04 Nov 2024, 11:32

I sat in a conference last week - primarily aimed at the industrial retail market - and one "really interesting" comment was made around the warehousing requirements in Yorkshire as a whole - there is clearly a lot of speculative warehousing being built in Yorkshire and across the country but following the boom of online shopping and the need for large scale distribution centres - there appears to be a bit of a tailing off on this market.

But what was noted by a valuer at CBRE was that there is a huge demand for general warehousing/industrial units - specifically for manufacturing companies that have been overlooked in the last 4/5 years

It would not surprise me one bit if the plans for glasshoughton we altered slightly for more general industrial sites compared to distribution as originally identified. Its not a major change but would need the designs re-done

sirocco7
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 315
Joined: 06 Aug 2014, 10:06
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by sirocco7 » 05 Nov 2024, 16:48

St Albans tiger wrote: 04 Nov 2024, 11:32 I sat in a conference last week - primarily aimed at the industrial retail market - and one "really interesting" comment was made around the warehousing requirements in Yorkshire as a whole - there is clearly a lot of speculative warehousing being built in Yorkshire and across the country but following the boom of online shopping and the need for large scale distribution centres - there appears to be a bit of a tailing off on this market.

But what was noted by a valuer at CBRE was that there is a huge demand for general warehousing/industrial units - specifically for manufacturing companies that have been overlooked in the last 4/5 years

It would not surprise me one bit if the plans for glasshoughton we altered slightly for more general industrial sites compared to distribution as originally identified. Its not a major change but would need the designs re-done

The planning permission is Hybrid, it’s been submitted with the intention of changing the design on the units to suit the specification of the occupants.

“Hybrid planning application seeking: (i) full planning permission for enabling works including incidental coal extraction to create development platforms along with off-site highways improvements and site access and installation of other supporting infrastructure, in addition to: (ii) outline planning permission for 141,085 sq. m employment development of which 105,834 sq. m of B8 floorspace and 35,251 sq. m (E(g)(ii), E(g)(iii), B2 or B8 floorspace together with ancillary offices and an electrical vehicle charging station (Sui generis), and hard and soft landscaping.”

User avatar
yorky
Verified
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 4843
Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 18:50
Location: York, UK
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by yorky » 05 Nov 2024, 16:53

so sirocco7, does this mean we are still on for a 12 million windfall?

User avatar
TheMotleyFox
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 95
Joined: 02 Apr 2022, 14:03
Location: Cas Vegas
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by TheMotleyFox » 05 Nov 2024, 17:14

It would be good if Martin could provide us with an update on planned works for the ground as it is now, replacing the cladding & turnstiles, lowering the Princess Street barrier and generally tidying up the stadium and making it look presentable. Some of this was supposed to be done with the Resilience fund from the council but things seem to have gone quiet?
Audacter Et Sincere

sirocco7
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 315
Joined: 06 Aug 2014, 10:06
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by sirocco7 » 05 Nov 2024, 17:21

yorky wrote: 05 Nov 2024, 16:53 so sirocco7, does this mean we are still on for a 12 million windfall?
I’ve no reason to say no as it stands. The information is all available for anybody to see on the planning portal.

sirocco7
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 315
Joined: 06 Aug 2014, 10:06
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by sirocco7 » 05 Nov 2024, 17:21

TheMotleyFox wrote: 05 Nov 2024, 17:14 It would be good if Martin could provide us with an update on planned works for the ground as it is now, replacing the cladding & turnstiles, lowering the Princess Street barrier and generally tidying up the stadium and making it look presentable. Some of this was supposed to be done with the Resilience fund from the council but things seem to have gone quiet?
I agree I’ve made some comments on Facebook and X about this .

Year of the Tiger
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 347
Joined: 25 May 2011, 22:35
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by Year of the Tiger » 05 Nov 2024, 18:09

yorky wrote: 05 Nov 2024, 16:53 so sirocco7, does this mean we are still on for a 12 million windfall?

It will only go ahead once the developers deem it financially viable.
At present i think it is unlikely, or even highly unlikely.
I posted earlier that Axiom have been looking for another development partner or potentially offloading to another developer.

The £12.2 million is an issue for Axiom, and as I understand they want to renegotiate the S106 agreement in order to progress the scheme.

There is approximately 30,000 tons of coal on site. There are no coal fired power stations left in the UK. In 2014, the value of the coal was circa £5.5m. At that time coal suppied 39& of UK energy, last year it was less than 2%.
Axiom after extracting the coal would have used the proceeds to part fund the development. Would this still be the case?

As suggested by some, it would be good if the club could give an update.

However, any update may be limited in nature due to commercial confidentiality.

Steve Gill stated in 2014, we would be in a brand new stadium for 2017.
Martin Jepson has indicated 2026 for any significant renovation.

Unfortunately, the club are heavily dependent on others, this may preclude any update with respect to Axiom.

5menofsteel
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 6297
Joined: 30 Nov 2020, 16:48
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by 5menofsteel » 05 Nov 2024, 18:24

I think that this uncertainty is the reason why we had to improve WR to secure the full stadium points . As thing stand , although not ideal for potential extra revenue that a new stand would bring , we are safe in the knowledge that WR now meets all necessary criteria for maximum stadium score .

This does take away an immediate need for the new stand in terms of IMG gradings , which is fantastic for the club , but as mentioned , the longer we have to wait , the more it hits us financially.

The irony is that if/when we do start work on the new stand , we would potentially lose 1.5 points in IMG gradings (1 point for stadium and 0.5 points for attendance as capacity without main stand and terracing next to it would drop too low to meet the necessary 7.5k average required) . Perhaps contingency plans are in place for this though as , with the new seats in PS seats totalling 1.7k we could keep our full stadium score with an additional 300 seats if/when the upgrade takes place.

sirocco7
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 315
Joined: 06 Aug 2014, 10:06
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by sirocco7 » 05 Nov 2024, 19:28

Year of the Tiger wrote: 05 Nov 2024, 18:09
yorky wrote: 05 Nov 2024, 16:53 so sirocco7, does this mean we are still on for a 12 million windfall?

It will only go ahead once the developers deem it financially viable.
At present i think it is unlikely, or even highly unlikely.
I posted earlier that Axiom have been looking for another development partner or potentially offloading to another developer.

The £12.2 million is an issue for Axiom, and as I understand they want to renegotiate the S106 agreement in order to progress the scheme.

There is approximately 30,000 tons of coal on site. There are no coal fired power stations left in the UK. In 2014, the value of the coal was circa £5.5m. At that time coal suppied 39& of UK energy, last year it was less than 2%.
Axiom after extracting the coal would have used the proceeds to part fund the development. Would this still be the case?

As suggested by some, it would be good if the club could give an update.

However, any update may be limited in nature due to commercial confidentiality.

Steve Gill stated in 2014, we would be in a brand new stadium for 2017.
Martin Jepson has indicated 2026 for any significant renovation.

Unfortunately, the club are heavily dependent on others, this may preclude any update with respect to Axiom.
I find the comment about the 106 agreement unlikely, it was only signed at the start of last month.

gateman
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 7524
Joined: 31 Mar 2016, 12:40
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by gateman » 05 Nov 2024, 19:44

RE IMG scoring System , how unfair it would be IF IF IF the club got the go ahead for the new stand whilst this was in progress we lose points, so loosing our A listing

The Firm
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3299
Joined: 05 Sep 2012, 15:24
Location: In your face.
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by The Firm » 05 Nov 2024, 19:49

Year of the Tiger wrote: 05 Nov 2024, 18:09
yorky wrote: 05 Nov 2024, 16:53 so sirocco7, does this mean we are still on for a 12 million windfall?

It will only go ahead once the developers deem it financially viable.
At present i think it is unlikely, or even highly unlikely.
I posted earlier that Axiom have been looking for another development partner or potentially offloading to another developer.

The £12.2 million is an issue for Axiom, and as I understand they want to renegotiate the S106 agreement in order to progress the scheme.

There is approximately 30,000 tons of coal on site. There are no coal fired power stations left in the UK. In 2014, the value of the coal was circa £5.5m. At that time coal suppied 39& of UK energy, last year it was less than 2%.
Axiom after extracting the coal would have used the proceeds to part fund the development. Would this still be the case?

As suggested by some, it would be good if the club could give an update.

However, any update may be limited in nature due to commercial confidentiality.

Steve Gill stated in 2014, we would be in a brand new stadium for 2017.
Martin Jepson has indicated 2026 for any significant renovation.

Unfortunately, the club are heavily dependent on others, this may preclude any update with respect to Axiom.
Axiom are not looking to renegotiate the S106 at all, in fact they only signed it exactly a month ago. It is set in stone and the council would not entertain any changes. As for the coal, a lot of the product extracted from opencast in the country has been for export abroad for a long time now, demand is still high elsewhere. They will have no problem selling it.

5menofsteel
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 6297
Joined: 30 Nov 2020, 16:48
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by 5menofsteel » 05 Nov 2024, 19:58

gateman wrote: 05 Nov 2024, 19:44 RE IMG scoring System , how unfair it would be IF IF IF the club got the go ahead for the new stand whilst this was in progress we lose points, so loosing our A listing
It would be difficult to take if it did cost us Category A and subsequently SL status . However , MJ has said that he thinks we are looking at 2026 now before any movement on the stadium front , which may fall nicely into place with the new TV deal . If an increase in the value of a new TV deal at the end of 2026 can support an extra 2 SL clubs , which has recently been mentioned for the future , then we will still hopefully make the top 14 irrespective of potential points lost during any upgrade .

Tamworth Tiger
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 8071
Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by Tamworth Tiger » 05 Nov 2024, 22:30

Think I read somewhere that Catalans have a similar stadium problem

User avatar
TheMotleyFox
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 95
Joined: 02 Apr 2022, 14:03
Location: Cas Vegas
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by TheMotleyFox » 06 Nov 2024, 15:38

Somethings happening down at the ground anyway, Cas have posted a picture of Massey on a digger. Caption says that the club are having some work done at the ground.
Audacter Et Sincere

User avatar
yorky
Verified
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 4843
Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 18:50
Location: York, UK
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by yorky » 06 Nov 2024, 15:40

TheMotleyFox wrote: 06 Nov 2024, 15:38 Somethings happening down at the ground anyway, Cas have posted a picture of Massey on a digger. Caption says that the club are having some work done at the ground.
lets hope something with the ground upgrade is happening?

User avatar
Robbo
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 574
Joined: 20 Sep 2010, 11:56
Contact:

Re: Stadium.

Post by Robbo » 06 Nov 2024, 19:06

we still have a chunk of WMDC money to work with.

Several posts back some asked about IF.

He divided the club by getting rid of all the shareholders.............................. and plenty more lies,fake news etc

However I am now looking forward and, i am enjoying the challenge of bringing back to the club those lost over the last 10 years.

I for one will be supporting MJ and his team once he gets things sorted.

Robbo
Truth is always best !

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests