[Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 328
- Joined: 14 Dec 2018, 07:16
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
6 from 6 absolutely brilliant! Don't think there was anything for the panel tonite. Injuries from tonight's game? Only saw CLare who seemed to turn/twist on his knee. Only 10 mixed tackles against very fresh legs tonite.
Job done over Easter, great effort by all involved over the 3 games, sweet Caroline all night tonite.
Job done over Easter, great effort by all involved over the 3 games, sweet Caroline all night tonite.
- the machine
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10135
- Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:21
- Twitter: @dphartshorne
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Double header at easter won't be a thing anymore by the sounds of things from what they said on sky pre match
"I can accept failure. Everyone fails at something, but I cannot accept not trying"
Michael Jordan
Michael Jordan
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: 19 Jul 2020, 10:44
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Have Cas ever won 3 from 3 over Easter under Powell ?
-
Verified
- Moderator
- Posts: 885
- Joined: 21 Dec 2016, 20:09
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
2014 they said on sky
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: 19 Jul 2020, 10:44
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Never liked Sam Tomkins on the field because he was very good and scored too many tries against Cas aswell as getting in the Refs face too much. But as pundit and in the future a coach he is very good. Puts Wilkins to shame.
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
He’s 17westerbeast73 wrote: ↑22 Apr 2022, 21:29 QQ Is a great player in open field running at players. The rest of his game is utter garbage.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 137
- Joined: 26 Jul 2019, 23:41
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Song in there somewhere.Mucky1978 wrote: ↑22 Apr 2022, 22:19He’s 17westerbeast73 wrote: ↑22 Apr 2022, 21:29 QQ Is a great player in open field running at players. The rest of his game is utter garbage.
He was just 17 if you know what I mean.
-
- New member
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 10 Sep 2020, 22:42
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Good entertainment all round, enjoyed seeing the kids and Cas scored some nice tries. Not sure the neutral would have got much out of it tho.
Much as I encourage Cas to use the forwards more, perhaps tonight spreading it wide would have produced a lot more points.
This whole Easter schedule has not been good for the players or the sport in general and I for one am glad the protests have led the RFL to drop it for next year.
Much as I encourage Cas to use the forwards more, perhaps tonight spreading it wide would have produced a lot more points.
This whole Easter schedule has not been good for the players or the sport in general and I for one am glad the protests have led the RFL to drop it for next year.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: 10 Dec 2020, 21:33
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Of all the criticism that we find if we wanted that's 3 wins from 3. We have to understand that we also have players out
-
- New member
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 10 Sep 2020, 22:42
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
I hope this doesn't come across as bitter but this must be the first time I've seen Mamo play well in a Cas shirt, perhaps this is his level! (Academy)..old cas lass wrote: ↑22 Apr 2022, 21:52 I wonder why QQ hardly saw the ball in the second half.
Everything went down right.
Thought mamo had a good game, one or two silly errors but all in all played well.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Poor game, did not enjoy that one bit. Only thing I'll say is 6 points in a week and that's all that matters.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 367
- Joined: 24 Dec 2018, 14:08
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Mainly good comments but still a few trolls. 6 out of 6 over Easter like someone said everyone should be happy with that. Yes saints played youth tonight but that meant much less fatigue and probably a bit more enthusiasm given our kids 3 games in 9 days. I thought we were very professional tonight. Many said could have been a banana skin but never looked in doubt. Well done all concerned
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Saints lads did well so I’m sure CW will be happy overall. We did enough, yes some handling errors but to be expected when mentally as well as physically spent. Our defence was good and discipline also much improved. QQ did amazingly well so any claim of garbage is plainly ridiculous at this stage of his development and first full appearance. Shameful comment against a 17 year old. Saints fans were full of praise for their debuts mistakes n all and we should show the same or we can’t call ourselves “supporters”. Well done lads on 6/6.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2660
- Joined: 04 Aug 2014, 19:32
- Location: Bury St Edmunds
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Agree.heritage1926 wrote: ↑22 Apr 2022, 22:41 Poor game, did not enjoy that one bit. Only thing I'll say is 6 points in a week and that's all that matters.
Credit to everyone involved with Saints tonight including their solid turn out of fans who braved the M62 on a Friday evening.
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23098
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
You can only play what’s in front of you, be it u19’s, I thought he had a good game just my opinion. Yours may differ.Saint John wrote: ↑22 Apr 2022, 22:37I hope this doesn't come across as bitter but this must be the first time I've seen Mamo play well in a Cas shirt, perhaps this is his level! (Academy)..old cas lass wrote: ↑22 Apr 2022, 21:52 I wonder why QQ hardly saw the ball in the second half.
Everything went down right.
Thought mamo had a good game, one or two silly errors but all in all played well.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 383
- Joined: 11 Jun 2021, 20:14
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Be a strange easter weekend feel like two big clubs have gifted us four points but not knock it up to them lol . As we are not fare off top four on paper we look a million miles away from being a top four team on field for sure
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 918
- Joined: 06 Jun 2019, 19:27
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
3 outa 3 over Easter. If nobody is happy with that I don't know what they'd be happy with. COYF
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
What a credit to the saints set up we could only dream of having such players in our second team, the turn out from the Saints was great at least six buses , six points to us well done lads
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 449
- Joined: 02 Jun 2021, 11:25
- Contact:
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
Absolutely. It's not been great to watch but I'll take wins for now.Brummietiger wrote: ↑22 Apr 2022, 21:01
If, and I emphasise if, we come away with 6 from 6 from the Easter programme, that will have been a fantastic effort. Everybody on this forum would have settled for that before the first game no matter how it was achieved. Apologies, perhaps not everybody.
Re: [Match Discussion] St Helens (H)
QQ only made one mistake that I can remember a dropped ball from the high kick which was a bad one to take. There kicks looked difficult all night.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 54 guests