Stadium

All things related to the Castleford Tigers.
FIat Capper
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 1657
Joined: 05 Jan 2021, 17:59
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by FIat Capper » 01 Jun 2022, 10:20

The demand for storage and distribution units in the Wakefield district is through the roof. Sitting centrally between the M1, M62 and A1(M) means there is easy access to the rest of Yorkshire and beyond.

There's huge potential at Glasshoughton but there may still be issues with the change of land use...

Tamworth Tiger
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 5862
Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by Tamworth Tiger » 01 Jun 2022, 13:00

FIat Capper wrote: 01 Jun 2022, 10:20 The demand for storage and distribution units in the Wakefield district is through the roof. Sitting centrally between the M1, M62 and A1(M) means there is easy access to the rest of Yorkshire and beyond.

There's huge potential at Glasshoughton but there may still be issues with the change of land use...
There will be issues so hopefully that will mean that the whole £8 million for planning gain for building on green belt will remain on the table

sirocco7
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 278
Joined: 06 Aug 2014, 10:06
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by sirocco7 » 22 Jun 2022, 22:46

The plans can be seen in detail below ….

https://axiom-j32.co.uk/

tigertragic
New member
Posts: 41
Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 19:54
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by tigertragic » 23 Jun 2022, 07:08

I read this as the pitch size is staying as is

Jon Wilkin will be happy as he won't need to invent a new reason to denigrate Cas

Fumper27
Super League Player
Super League Player
Posts: 11368
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 08:10
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by Fumper27 » 23 Jun 2022, 07:58

10,020 capacity

orrsome
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 735
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 12:13
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by orrsome » 23 Jun 2022, 08:00

No mention of the amount of funding to be provided for the ground upgrade in addition to the £2m from WMDC.
Will we get £8m same as Trin got?

JIN. JER
New member
Posts: 3
Joined: 16 Jun 2022, 13:18
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by JIN. JER » 23 Jun 2022, 10:38

orrsome wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 08:00 No mention of the amount of funding to be provided for the ground upgrade in addition to the £2m from WMDC.
Will we get £8m same as Trin got?
Where do you think Trinity got the £8M from?

orrsome
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 735
Joined: 31 Mar 2011, 12:13
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by orrsome » 23 Jun 2022, 12:01

From the developer?
Why do you ask?
My question is how that figure was arrived at and should we be looking at a similar sum?

pat
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 278
Joined: 15 Jul 2006, 16:54
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by pat » 23 Jun 2022, 12:08

Will we have to Waite if permission is given for them to find tenants before they hand the money over has it looks like they have no tenants has yet.

derbystiger
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 2286
Joined: 21 Dec 2014, 00:40
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by derbystiger » 23 Jun 2022, 12:28

Does anyone think that the club should re open the ‘buy a brick’ scheme for newer fans etc… that weren’t around / too young to afford etc… the first time round? I have one from the original scheme but would definitely buy another couple for Mum and Dad if they re opened it - every penny counts.

St Albans tiger
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 492
Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 13:04
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by St Albans tiger » 23 Jun 2022, 14:07

pat wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 12:08 Will we have to Waite if permission is given for them to find tenants before they hand the money over has it looks like they have no tenants has yet.
They will have to hand over The cash before they even start construction on the units... Exactly the same as for the original plans. This time with it being industrial units it won't be made public who they are, like it was with high street shops etc

tigerfeat
Super League Player
Super League Player
Posts: 12896
Joined: 23 Jun 2014, 12:07
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by tigerfeat » 23 Jun 2022, 14:19

How much we end up getting is the 64,000 dollar question in all this
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi

User avatar
old cas lass
Verified
Grand Final Winner
Grand Final Winner
Posts: 20613
Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by old cas lass » 23 Jun 2022, 15:07

tigerfeat wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 14:19 How much we end up getting is the 64,000 dollar question in all this
I’m not gonna hold my breath.
We’ve here before.

tigerfeat
Super League Player
Super League Player
Posts: 12896
Joined: 23 Jun 2014, 12:07
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by tigerfeat » 23 Jun 2022, 15:22

old cas lass wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 15:07
tigerfeat wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 14:19 How much we end up getting is the 64,000 dollar question in all this
I’m not gonna hold my breath.
We’ve here before.
Indeed a lot of false dawns over the last twenty years promises brocken and some comments trying to lead people down the garden path along the way I think most people take the view now I will believe it when I see it
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi

sirocco7
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 278
Joined: 06 Aug 2014, 10:06
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by sirocco7 » 23 Jun 2022, 15:22

old cas lass wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 15:07
tigerfeat wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 14:19 How much we end up getting is the 64,000 dollar question in all this
I’m not gonna hold my breath.
We’ve here before.
We have you are right , but If this one falls through it’s quite simple we won’t be a Super League Club for much longer.

User avatar
yorky
Verified
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 3892
Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 18:50
Location: York, UK
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by yorky » 23 Jun 2022, 15:36

sirocco7 wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 15:22
old cas lass wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 15:07
tigerfeat wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 14:19 How much we end up getting is the 64,000 dollar question in all this
I’m not gonna hold my breath.
We’ve here before.
We have you are right , but If this one falls through it’s quite simple we won’t be a Super League Club for much longer.
this is the problem & im surprised the planners haven't taken to opportunity to get the pitch to the right size as this could be another thorn in our side for future super league criteria :?:

gateman
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 4622
Joined: 31 Mar 2016, 12:40
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by gateman » 23 Jun 2022, 15:52

funds there are a number of avenues that can be pursued to get extra funding sport England is one there are a number more , my son as done a great job for Normanton Knights raising enough money for new changing rooms draining and seeding of two pitchers a disabled toilet among loads of other things

derbystiger
League One Player
League One Player
Posts: 2286
Joined: 21 Dec 2014, 00:40
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by derbystiger » 23 Jun 2022, 16:48

yorky wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 15:36
sirocco7 wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 15:22
old cas lass wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 15:07
tigerfeat wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 14:19 How much we end up getting is the 64,000 dollar question in all this
I’m not gonna hold my breath.
We’ve here before.
We have you are right , but If this one falls through it’s quite simple we won’t be a Super League Club for much longer.
this is the problem & im surprised the planners haven't taken to opportunity to get the pitch to the right size as this could be another thorn in our side for future super league criteria :?:
Agree with you there, Yorky. With a total revamp its difficult to understand that they are not lengthening the pitch - surely there is enough room at the Railway end to do it?

Tamworth Tiger
Championship Player
Championship Player
Posts: 5862
Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by Tamworth Tiger » 23 Jun 2022, 18:16

Presumably because it would be a lot more expensive to move the terracing than do it up?

User avatar
steadygetyerboots-on
Academy Player
Academy Player
Posts: 1033
Joined: 29 May 2007, 12:01
Location: Working in the belly of the beast
Contact:

Re: Stadium

Post by steadygetyerboots-on » 25 Jun 2022, 12:06

Tamworth Tiger wrote: 23 Jun 2022, 18:16 Presumably because it would be a lot more expensive to move the terracing than do it up?
I get the cost argument, but we will never get a better opportunity to get the pitch dimensions up to the required standard. For me; I wouldn’t give the RFL any opportunity to kick us with something so basic.
"Stand by me as I stand by you, be brave and dare to dream".

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], BradfordTiger, Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 23 guests