NRL
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 25 Jan 2025, 13:57
- Contact:
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 23:02
- Location: WAKEFIELD
- Contact:
Re: NRL
Not a chance for a 14 team SL, the current clubs are already complaining about the share of the TV money, probably more chance of a 10 side comp.Railwayend wrote: ↑31 Mar 2025, 23:32Yeah am sure when heatherington took the job on he made it clear they had to be in super league ,once there in expect it to reverse
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 25 Jan 2025, 13:57
- Contact:
Re: NRL
This as all come about cos wood back at the rfL and heatherington joining London in the NRL project before they takeover super league
London and Bradford will be promoted as thankyou's
London and Bradford will be promoted as thankyou's
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1972
- Joined: 06 Mar 2012, 15:21
- Twitter: Sacked social media
- Location: Horbury
- Contact:
Re: NRL
I feel quite anti-Wood as I made clear elsewhere, but there is something to be said for what McMannus said to some extent. The veneer when Nigel was here before was very glossy and the top line numbers better. Granted anything outside SL was dying, but there is some merit to the argument.
I don't know about anyone else, the "new dawns" get so tiresome, can we just have a period of clear vision, strategy and set our stall out for something please. The core problem is not enough people watch, which in turn means it isn't attractive for advertising and in turn means there isn't enough money.
I don't know about anyone else, the "new dawns" get so tiresome, can we just have a period of clear vision, strategy and set our stall out for something please. The core problem is not enough people watch, which in turn means it isn't attractive for advertising and in turn means there isn't enough money.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests