Wakefield H
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 956
- Joined: 26 Jul 2011, 18:25
- Twitter: no
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
Double post
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 12 Mar 2012, 17:24
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
He could have lamed him doing that crap, there's nothing safe or right about it, that's the type of crap that can change your entire life not just a game.steadygetyerboots-on wrote: I see the intent to bend the knee (the way it’s supposed to bend) to get a big fella to the floor to prevent him off loading or continuing forward, but I don’t see any intent to injure. I definitely think Wigan sail close to the wind with these types of tackles & because they’re so aggressive in defence it makes it look worse, but in this particular tackle I just don’t see it.
Hitting any part of the knee with that intent and technique is done soley to injure.
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
Comprehension skills struggling? Did you miss the word “similar”? Last time I looked similar meant having a likeness to something. The fact that 13/17 of their squad (or 76% in percentage terms) was the same falls into that category, don’t you agree? I never said “same team”.Tigerwood posse wrote:
hardly the same team that faced us the week before, they were without SAMMUT, GREENWOOD, MANFREDI AND HARDAKER against Wakey .... SO YOU ARE WRONG HUDDS ... YOU ARE SUCH A CLEVER CLOGS!!!
They may have been missing 4 players but they got 3 back, all of which are good enough to be in their first choice 17 (Powell, Davies and Escare) or would be.
For what it’s worth, I was actually replying (and agreeing) to the post above mine not your own. They had a strong backline against us but the forwards weren’t much to be feared.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!
Re: Wakefield H
Lmao leave him alone spends alot off time google for us on here. Even if he dont now what it is he is posting.Tigerwood posse wrote:
hardly the same team that faced us the week before, they were without SAMMUT, GREENWOOD, MANFREDI AND HARDAKER against Wakey .... SO YOU ARE WRONG HUDDS ... YOU ARE SUCH A CLEVER CLOGS!!!
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
didn't rangi get a long ban (while playing for salford) for a tackle like that from behind.Fumper27 wrote:That’s awful to watch. Makes me cringe as I had to quit the game through a knee injury. That player (who was it) needs to cop a ban of at least 6 games.the machine wrote:https://twitter.com/david_fifita_/statu ... 02688?s=19tigerfeat wrote:Seems like Wigan were back to there hold tricks last night third man coming in doing damage to the legs
jo brand is eddie warings love child
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2986
- Joined: 21 Dec 2014, 00:40
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
6 or 7 games I think Rangi got if memory serves me rightlurcher wrote:didn't rangi get a long ban (while playing for salford) for a tackle like that from behind.Fumper27 wrote:That’s awful to watch. Makes me cringe as I had to quit the game through a knee injury. That player (who was it) needs to cop a ban of at least 6 games.the machine wrote:https://twitter.com/david_fifita_/statu ... 02688?s=19tigerfeat wrote:Seems like Wigan were back to there hold tricks last night third man coming in doing damage to the legs
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 956
- Joined: 26 Jul 2011, 18:25
- Twitter: no
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
Good god, you are such an arrogant arse!! It isn’t even similar FFS, so just because you can’t admit you’re wrong, you actually think that Powell, Davies & Escare are the same quality as Hardaker (best full back in country at Cas) Greenwood (Ex NRL & was destroying us when he was on the pitch), Manfredi (easily best winger in SL if he could stay injury free) and Sammut ( always been underrated and also was cutting us to shreds before he was injured and taken off), you are such a muppet !!!HuddsTigers wrote:Comprehension skills struggling? Did you miss the word “similar”? Last time I looked similar meant having a likeness to something. The fact that 13/17 of their squad (or 76% in percentage terms) was the same falls into that category, don’t you agree? I never said “same team”.Tigerwood posse wrote:
hardly the same team that faced us the week before, they were without SAMMUT, GREENWOOD, MANFREDI AND HARDAKER against Wakey .... SO YOU ARE WRONG HUDDS ... YOU ARE SUCH A CLEVER CLOGS!!!
They may have been missing 4 players but they got 3 back, all of which are good enough to be in their first choice 17 (Powell, Davies and Escare) or would be.
For what it’s worth, I was actually replying (and agreeing) to the post above mine not your own. They had a strong backline against us but the forwards weren’t much to be feared.
Re: Wakefield H
Come on guys, please let’s stop this name calling and abuse, everyone is entitled to an opinion! If you disagree with another poster, of course, give your own opinion on the matter, but this should never include personal abuse or profanities.
Danny Boy
Re: Wakefield H
Tigerwood posse wrote:Good god, you are such an arrogant arse!! It isn’t even similar FFS, so just because you can’t admit you’re wrong, you actually think that Powell, Davies & Escare are the same quality as Hardaker (best full back in country at Cas) Greenwood (Ex NRL & was destroying us when he was on the pitch), Manfredi (easily best winger in SL if he could stay injury free) and Sammut ( always been underrated and also was cutting us to shreds before he was injured and taken off), you are such a muppet !!!HuddsTigers wrote:Comprehension skills struggling? Did you miss the word “similar”? Last time I looked similar meant having a likeness to something. The fact that 13/17 of their squad (or 76% in percentage terms) was the same falls into that category, don’t you agree? I never said “same team”.Tigerwood posse wrote:
hardly the same team that faced us the week before, they were without SAMMUT, GREENWOOD, MANFREDI AND HARDAKER against Wakey .... SO YOU ARE WRONG HUDDS ... YOU ARE SUCH A CLEVER CLOGS!!!
They may have been missing 4 players but they got 3 back, all of which are good enough to be in their first choice 17 (Powell, Davies and Escare) or would be.
For what it’s worth, I was actually replying (and agreeing) to the post above mine not your own. They had a strong backline against us but the forwards weren’t much to be feared.
LMAO
Hardaker (best full back in country at Cas)
But he is not at Cas and hasn't been for 2 years. He has been terrible so for at Wigan
Re: Wakefield H
I wouldn't say hardaker has been terrible at Wigan I'd say he's just done what's needed I think personally if sammut played Wigan would see a whole different and better zak as sammut is a player zak can play off the back of which is why he shined so bright for us.
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23223
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
Everything about cas suited Hardakers play.
Everything at Wigan doesn’t.
Anyhow might be a boost for us Thursday.
Possibly a big game player out for Wakefield.
Watch this space.
Everything at Wigan doesn’t.
Anyhow might be a boost for us Thursday.
Possibly a big game player out for Wakefield.
Watch this space.
Re: Wakefield H
Quite possibly a few from what I'm hearing.old cas lass wrote:Everything about cas suited Hardakers play.
Everything at Wigan doesn’t.
Anyhow might be a boost for us Thursday.
Possibly a big game player out for Wakefield.
Watch this space.
Re: Wakefield H
I agree with what hudds tiger said yesterday Powell will be preparing the team to face a strong challange
He will be more concerned to get cas playing with a bit more spark in attack and cutting out some of the dumb stuff we've been doing
Wakefield fans with be hoping Thursday is when they get some pay back for resent times I've just got a feeling cas will play well and win tho
He will be more concerned to get cas playing with a bit more spark in attack and cutting out some of the dumb stuff we've been doing
Wakefield fans with be hoping Thursday is when they get some pay back for resent times I've just got a feeling cas will play well and win tho
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
Re: Wakefield H
We have certain poster who have a disliking of Hudds tiger, every time he posts someone is picking it apart and having a go at him,everyone expects to disagree with posts, but every time Hudds posts he gets slated, and the silly thing is he's posts contain more quality and information about the club than the lot of his knockers put together.Danny Boy wrote:Come on guys, please let’s stop this name calling and abuse, everyone is entitled to an opinion! If you disagree with another poster, of course, give your own opinion on the matter, but this should never include personal abuse or profanities.
Has daft has it sounds some of the replies he gets is nothing short of on line bullying.
Re: Wakefield H
Looks like we'll be without Brough and Miller on Thursday, Brough has broken his thumb apparently. Jeez, looks like Cas might have an easy ride on Thursday.
Re: Wakefield H
Did you see us on Thursday??? We are full of injuries too and literally can do nothing going forward. I'm not having non of this "easy ride stuff" Wakey are playing better than we are so will be toughJIN JER wrote:Looks like we'll be without Brough and Miller on Thursday, Brough has broken his thumb apparently. Jeez, looks like Cas might have an easy ride on Thursday.
Re: Wakefield H
I did mate, I just think with (I'm assuming) Hamsh and Reynolds in the middle we might struggle, they haven't played together yet. We'll be without Tupou, Johnstone, Lynne, Brough, Wood and possibly Millar missing. That's practically all our flare gone in one go.Swagger wrote:Did you see us on Thursday??? We are full of injuries too and literally can do nothing going forward. I'm not having non of this "easy ride stuff" Wakey are playing better than we are so will be toughJIN JER wrote:Looks like we'll be without Brough and Miller on Thursday, Brough has broken his thumb apparently. Jeez, looks like Cas might have an easy ride on Thursday.
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23223
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
Yep that’s the one I was hinting at.JIN JER wrote:Looks like we'll be without Brough and Miller on Thursday, Brough has broken his thumb apparently. Jeez, looks like Cas might have an easy ride on Thursday.
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
Tigerwood posse wrote:Good god, you are such an arrogant arse!! It isn’t even similar FFS, so just because you can’t admit you’re wrong, you actually think that Powell, Davies & Escare are the same quality as Hardaker (best full back in country at Cas) Greenwood (Ex NRL & was destroying us when he was on the pitch), Manfredi (easily best winger in SL if he could stay injury free) and Sammut ( always been underrated and also was cutting us to shreds before he was injured and taken off), you are such a muppet !!!HuddsTigers wrote:Comprehension skills struggling? Did you miss the word “similar”? Last time I looked similar meant having a likeness to something. The fact that 13/17 of their squad (or 76% in percentage terms) was the same falls into that category, don’t you agree? I never said “same team”.Tigerwood posse wrote:
hardly the same team that faced us the week before, they were without SAMMUT, GREENWOOD, MANFREDI AND HARDAKER against Wakey .... SO YOU ARE WRONG HUDDS ... YOU ARE SUCH A CLEVER CLOGS!!!
They may have been missing 4 players but they got 3 back, all of which are good enough to be in their first choice 17 (Powell, Davies and Escare) or would be.
For what it’s worth, I was actually replying (and agreeing) to the post above mine not your own. They had a strong backline against us but the forwards weren’t much to be feared.
No one was comparing the players in or out in terms of quality except you above.
The fact you have moved the discussion on to a totally different point because you know that the vast majority of the 17 (13/17) ARE the same says it all. Not arrogant - you had a pop first for no apparent reason when I didn’t reply to you. So it’s not worth it and this will be my last reply to you on this matter because other forum users deserve much better than to see this piffle every single day.
Back to Wakefield, we have always seemed to cope well with their best. If we can get a few bodies back such as Massey and Rankin, I’d feel a bit more confident.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: 22 Jun 2012, 16:48
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield H
I did mate, I just think with (I'm assuming) Hamsh and Reynolds in the middle we might struggle, they haven't played together yet. We'll be without Tupou, Johnstone, Lynne, Brough, Wood and possibly Millar missing. That's practically all our flare gone in one go.[/quote]
No flares please Jin Ger!
Pity both squads are decimated.
Still two best teams in West Yorkshire.
Here's to a good game.
No more injuries.
Decided by the players not poor officiating.
COYF
No flares please Jin Ger!
Pity both squads are decimated.
Still two best teams in West Yorkshire.
Here's to a good game.
No more injuries.
Decided by the players not poor officiating.
COYF
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], BradfordTiger, gateman and 64 guests