As with many retention and recruitment decisions, I don’t think it’s a matter of whether we want to keep him or not; it’s a matter of how much percentage of the salary cap he takes up and whether he is worth it.Fumper27 wrote: ↑06 Feb 2020, 10:57So are we bothered if he moves on if he’s so inconsistent?old cas lass wrote: ↑06 Feb 2020, 10:23He’s had one good year.Fumper27 wrote: ↑06 Feb 2020, 07:53And when will supporters realise that a rugby career is a short one, so players want to get out of it what they can, whilst they can?
I don’t begrudge anyone who “uses” our club in that way. To me, it means that they’ve performed well whilst playing for us, which is all I ask for.
With maybe a dozen good games dotted here and there.
I’d like to keep McMeeken. But if he’s asking for more money, I could completely understand the club not giving him that. He’s not done anything to warrant a pay rise since he signed his current deal towards the end of 2017. If he can get more money than we think he’s worth at another club, that’s fine.
On a more general note, I wish the club were a little more ruthless with retention. If we want to keep him, offer him a deal now and say he has until the end of April to sign it. If he wants to take his chances of getting more money elsewhere come May, he is more than welcome to do so - but don’t expect our offer to still be there. If he wants to test his worth on the open market, we’ll so the same from the club’s point of view and may well offer his wage to someone else. This would leave him in a weak negotiating position with other clubs.
We saw what happened when Latrell Mitchell thought he could hold Sydney Roosters to ransom - the club took a stand, withdrew their contract offer and he ended up having to take less money than he was offered in the first place. Wakefield did it with Hampshire too - he thought he was worth more than he was so he left the club. He then signed on a lower deal than he was originally offered when he realised that he was in a weak negotiating position.