Tigers to go for Carney?

G Man90 · Post by **G Man90** » 06 Aug 2008, 14:17

yep defo b a gd signing.
but wud he b a regular. if so who wud make way 4 him?

ten · Post by **ten** » 06 Aug 2008, 14:20

im guessing chase would play 9 with hudson interchanging. but then again chase has come over to play 6 as matterson says and not be interchanged with hudson. therefore, i dont see us signing carney.

G Man90 · Post by **G Man90** » 06 Aug 2008, 14:22

yes he a come ere 2 be 6 has chase and hudson probably wouldnt like coming off the bench anyway...
we should introduce a youngster to do that role by coming off the bench maybe a sean johnson or even gareth swift

dettoriman · Post by **dettoriman** » 06 Aug 2008, 14:24

G Man90 wrote:yes he a come ere 2 be 6 has chase and hudson probably wouldnt like coming off the bench anyway...
we should introduce a youngster to do that role by coming off the bench maybe a sean johnson or even gareth swift

Sean Johnson for me should be named on the bench for this season

As for in future for me Hudson would start the games with Chase replacing him off the bench, I always feel its better to have the pacier player coming on when the forwards are tired

ten · Post by **ten** » 06 Aug 2008, 14:30

dettoriman, if you're hoping chase comes off the bench to interchange with hudson, who you think will play 6?

dorn (likely to be going), mcgoldrick (not good enough at 6) or........?

dettoriman · Post by **dettoriman** » 06 Aug 2008, 14:31

ten wrote:dettoriman, if you're hoping chase comes off the bench to interchange with hudson, who you think will play 6?

dorn (likely to be going), mcgoldrick (not good enough at 6) or........?

I arent mate - I was saying if we signed another 6. Which i dont think we will so chase will play 6

ten · Post by **ten** » 06 Aug 2008, 14:33

oh right, i agree what you're saying about the pace thing with chase being subbed and coming on to make the impact. but then again it looks set that he will be 6. therefore, this means a youngster would make the first team and interchange with hudson unless we signed another hoooker which i dont see at the minute.

Fully · Post by **Fully** » 09 Aug 2008, 00:42

We've apparently expressed an interest in Carney.

ten · Post by **ten** » 09 Aug 2008, 00:51

Matterson said he plans on playing chase at 6. If cas did get carney where would chase play? Im guessing if carney came down then chase would be interchaged with hudson throughout the season. Is that really the best way to use chase who has just been included in the new zealand international side? Chase being an international at the highest level, which cas have none of (despite two worthy candidates in joe and shenny), being subbed is not the smartest coaching move. But then again that isnt the hardest thing to work out.

monkeyface · Post by **monkeyface** » 09 Aug 2008, 06:39

i hope hes on his way,

monkeyface · Post by **monkeyface** » 09 Aug 2008, 06:40

Fully wrote:We've apparently expressed an interest in Carney.

about 2 weeks ago , as you usually say!!!

danny lad · Post by **danny lad** » 09 Aug 2008, 12:04

get carney signed up now, we wouldn't be finishing last then.

hudson
sherwin
chase
carney.

the amount of creativity there would give our backs ample chance of try time

WHELDON-ROAD-END · Post by **WHELDON-ROAD-END** » 09 Aug 2008, 14:13

Chase is in the NZ team!

So why the hell would you want a to be international on the bench!

Its international players we have needed for last few years and now people say he should interchange!

Bomber · Post by **Bomber** » 09 Aug 2008, 14:33

Doesn't Roby ( also an international) prove very effective off the bench.
It's a 17 man game these days not 13

cutsyke tiger · Post by **cutsyke tiger** » 09 Aug 2008, 16:29

G Man90 wrote:yep defo b a gd signing.
but wud he b a regular. if so who wud make way 4 him?

Whats with the text language thought it was frowned on ?

Post by Di » 09 Aug 2008, 17:20

It is and they have been asked once not to do it

If it persists there will have to be warnings issued, it may sound petty, but using text talk isn't fair on some of the user

we actually have a couple of users that are visually impaired and use programmes to read the forum, these programmes have difficulty reading text talk, so kids have a thought for these people, and it isn't that hard to type words in full is it

old cas lass · Post by **old cas lass** » 09 Aug 2008, 17:38

Di wrote:It is and they have been asked once not to do it

If it persists there will have to be warnings issued, it may sound petty, but using text talk isn't fair on some of the user

we actually have a couple of users that are visually impaired and use programmes to read the forum, these programmes have difficulty reading text talk, so kids have a thought for these people, and it isn't that hard to type words in full is it

:clap: well said Di, takes me ages to decypher it sometimes.

WHELDON-ROAD-END · Post by **WHELDON-ROAD-END** » 09 Aug 2008, 17:57

Di wrote:So kids have a thought for these people.

Im sure some of the people on here who use text talk are adults! :neutral:

Post by Di » 09 Aug 2008, 19:29

WHELDON-ROAD-END wrote:
Di wrote:So kids have a thought for these people.
Im sure some of the people on here who use text talk are adults! :neutral:

I can think of 2 people that have done it recently and to me they kids, they certainly over half my age

dettoriman · Post by **dettoriman** » 09 Aug 2008, 22:37

Di wrote:
WHELDON-ROAD-END wrote:
Di wrote:So kids have a thought for these people.
Im sure some of the people on here who use text talk are adults! :neutral:

I can think of 2 people that have done it recently and to me they kids, they certainly over half my age

Arent we all

Casforum • The Leading Castleford Tigers Community

Tigers to go for Carney?

Who is online