Hull KR up next

[Fumper27]

Niall Evalds
Derrell Olpherts
Peter Mata’utia
Michael Shenton
James Clare
Jake Trueman
Danny Richardson
Lewis Bienek
Paul McShane
Daniel Smith
Oliver Holmes
Jordan Turner
Nathan Massey

GOB
JSL
George Griffin
Tyla Hepi

Adam Milner
Lewis Peachey
Brad Martin
Sam Hall

[gateman]

the way brad Martin as stood up it would be a shame if he is not in the 17

[derbystiger]

Niall Evalds
Derrell Olpherts
Peter Mata’utia
Michael Shenton
Jordan Turner
Jake Trueman
Danny Richardson
Lewis Bienek
Paul McShane
Daniel Smith
Oliver Holmes
George Griffin
Nathan Massey

GOB
JSL
Adam Milner
Brad Martin


Lewis Peachey
Tyla Hepi
Sam Hall
James Clare

[Piquad1]

Got a funny feeling we might lose this one. Hope I'm wrong though. But time will tell.coyf.

[Danny Boy]

I've got a feeling it will be more like the below, as in an interview Daryl said James Clare would be playing, so I reckon Jordan Turner will be in the forwards on Monday:

Niall Evalds

Derrell Olpherts
Peter Mata’utia
Michael Shenton
James Clare

Jake Trueman
Danny Richardson

Nathan Massey
Paul McShane
Daniel Smith
Oliver Holmes
Jordan Turner
Adam Milner

Subs:
GOB
JSL
George Griffin
Brad Martin

[tigerfeat]

Can't see Clare playing Powell usually likes the players coming back from injury to be in the squad for a couple of weeks anyway Turners been excellent on the wing why would you drop him for Clare

[on side]

Evalds
Olpherts
Pete
Turner
Clare
Truey
Richardson
Griffin
McShane
Massey
Holmes
Jesse
Milner

GOB
Smith
Bienek
Martin

Why Clare back in Shenton injured can't see powell droping Shenton

Because that’s the posters opinion

Do you not see the irony in you putting that after saying come on here to belittle others.

Can find countless post you doing exactly same old boy has, some other posters have pointed out this about you . I asked why Clare was back in not belittle as, you constantly try and, do talk about irony

[old cas lass]

Can't see Clare playing Powell usually likes the players coming back from injury to be in the squad for a couple of weeks anyway Turners been excellent on the wing why would you drop him for Clare

He’s already said in and interview that he plays this week.

[Fumper27]

Got a funny feeling we might lose this one. Hope I'm wrong though. But time will tell.coyf.

Me too!

[on side]

Got a funny feeling we might lose this one. Hope I'm wrong though. But time will tell.coyf.

Me too!

If half backs turn up Evalds starts playing good again maca does, what he's being doing win by 12'. Probably get some good odds u fancy hull kr.

[Fumper27]

Got a funny feeling we might lose this one. Hope I'm wrong though. But time will tell.coyf.

Me too!

Me too as in hope you’re wrong not I think we’ll lose.

[old cas lass]

I’m a bit iffy with this game.
Our pack looks lightweight.
Gonna miss millo and watts big style.
More than we think.
Need players like Griffin and hepi to stand up.

[old cas lass]

https://castlefordtigers.com/article.php?id=7416


I know I’m a bit thick.
Does this mean you have to wear face coverings all the time even when you are in your bubble on the terrace.
Or just while entering the ground and finding your place.

[Fumper27]

https://castlefordtigers.com/article.php?id=7416


I know I’m a bit thick.
Does this mean you have to wear face coverings all the time even when you are in your bubble on the terrace.
Or just while entering the ground and finding your place.

I read it that once “in your viewing area” you can take your mask off. Then again, I know what you look like OCL so please keep yours on

[old cas lass]

https://castlefordtigers.com/article.php?id=7416


I know I’m a bit thick.
Does this mean you have to wear face coverings all the time even when you are in your bubble on the terrace.
Or just while entering the ground and finding your place.

I read it that once “in your viewing area” you can take your mask off. Then again, I know what you look like OCL so please keep yours on

Cheeky bugger.

[nottinghamtiger]

Looks sensible to me.

Though the demand for those exempt from wearing face coverings to show an exemption certificate isn’t actually legal.

[HuddsTigers]

Looks sensible to me.

Though the demand for those exempt from wearing face coverings to show an exemption certificate isn’t actually legal.

While not enforceable by law, surely it is upto the club if they want to put additional terms of entry in place?

And it is a law that you have to wear a face mask inside sports grounds. If people start taking the pee it could see fans being stopped going to games or action taken against said individuals.

And it's hardly a barrier when you can just download one off the .gov website.

[nottinghamtiger]

Looks sensible to me.

Though the demand for those exempt from wearing face coverings to show an exemption certificate isn’t actually legal.

While not enforceable by law, surely it is upto the club if they want to put additional terms of entry in place?

And it is a law that you have to wear a face mask inside sports grounds. If people start taking the pee it could see fans being stopped going to games or action taken against said individuals.

And it's hardly a barrier when you can just download one off the .gov website.

There have been test cases with this already.
Refusing to admit someone because they cannot wear a face-covering due to a disability is discriminatory.
The club can have additional terms of entry, but those terms cannot be discriminatory.

There is no law that face-coverings have to be worn in outdoor sports stadiums. Supporters can remove them when they are in their ‘viewing area’ tomorrow.

As for downloading one from the .gov website, this isn’t what the club have demanded. And it’s still a barrier for those without internet access and printing equipment.

[DebH]

Does anyone know if you have to get into ground at allocated times on ticket? Website says you do but mine is 6:15 which is v early for 745 kick off with no cover at railway end. Thanks

[HuddsTigers]

Looks sensible to me.

Though the demand for those exempt from wearing face coverings to show an exemption certificate isn’t actually legal.

While not enforceable by law, surely it is upto the club if they want to put additional terms of entry in place?

And it is a law that you have to wear a face mask inside sports grounds. If people start taking the pee it could see fans being stopped going to games or action taken against said individuals.

And it's hardly a barrier when you can just download one off the .gov website.

There have been test cases with this already.
Refusing to admit someone because they cannot wear a face-covering due to a disability is discriminatory.
The club can have additional terms of entry, but those terms cannot be discriminatory.

There is no law that face-coverings have to be worn in outdoor sports stadiums. Supporters can remove them when they are in their ‘viewing area’ tomorrow.

As for downloading one from the .gov website, this isn’t what the club have demanded. And it’s still a barrier for those without internet access and printing equipment.

The club hasn't said people would be refused entry though. What if the reason is as simple as trying to prevent hold ups on entry, making sure that people are aware of who is exempt so they can keep their distance, and also as a preventative measure against everyone thinking they shouldn't have to wear one.

I'd suspect most legitimate people would have one already downloaded for when out and about on public transport, in shops etc, a year or more into the pandemic.

The club can't stop people but it can kindly request they bring one to make everything smoother and easier for the benefit of everyone.