Not talking about how the signings have performed (is this down to Wells? His job is likely to be to sign them if the coach wants them). But the calibre of them, ie were they proven high level regurlar players before we signed them. From your list only Hardaker and possibly Wardle, who was pre Wells fall into that bracket. The example I used were all players who have played in big NRL or SL games at top sides. So at the time of signing would be considered high calibre signings.nottinghamtiger wrote: ↑14 Nov 2020, 01:32Evalds has yet to play for us. I have no idea how anyone can claim that Feki or Blair have been anything other than abject failures. Richardson has looked okay, but he’s nowhere near the level of a top SL half-back.KB80 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2020, 01:09Essentially it seems to me Gratton and Wells replaced Gills responsibilities and Wells was asked to take some strain off Powell.nottinghamtiger wrote: ↑14 Nov 2020, 00:35So if his role isn’t really clear, what exactly IS he contributing? What does he actually do?KB80 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2020, 00:31 Take Wells out of the equation and Gratton is in more control, do we want that? Tbf I also doubt anyone on this forum knows the full scope of Wells responsibilities. In terms of recruitment the area he is getting criticism for:
Does he identify signings or just try and make the deal happen? Does anyone know what proportion he gets over the line? Comparable to other clubs with similar budgets.
I spose the point I am making is does anyone in this forum have the info they would need to assess the job he is doing.
And what does he bring that we didn’t have before his appointment? Because I can’t see any contribution whatsoever. All I see is decline.
I would argue the biggest decline isn't the calibre of players we have recruited (Watts, Evalds, Feki, Blair, Richardson to name a few) are high calibre signings.
With the exception of Hardaker and Robert's they are higher calibre than the players we were signing in 2016/17.
Is it Wells principaly responsible that some of these players haven't performed? (Not unless he identified them as signings alone, is over seeing their conditioning and coaching them)
How much say does Wells have in conditioning? That's an area of decline.
Looking at the accounts released commercially we look to.be in decline in that area.
I also think that since 2017 several clubs have chucked big sums of money at building much better squads then they had in 2017. Cas cant do that financially. Is that Wells fault?
I dont know if Wells is doing a decent job, but nor does anyone on this forum. But I'm not convinced this season and apparent decline can be laid at his door.
If we have been signing higher quality players than we were prior to 2017, I’m not sure how we were by far the best team that season and have now slipped to the lower-end of the league. The signings before 2017 (Dorn, Gale, McMeeken, Solomona, McShane, JSL, Eden, Hardaker etc) we’re far, far better than the vast majority we have made since 2017 (Ellis, Clare, Wardle, Lo, Green, Clark, Aston, Blair. Feki). What is the difference? Jon Wells.
His role is unclear, we have regressed since he has been involved and we’ve dropped from 1st (by 10 points) to 9th in Super League in the space of three seasons.
Cas did a media piece on how they identify signings, etc a bit back. So applying this and using Feki as an example.
The coaches, player performance team and Wells identified Feki as a potential signing. They met, discussed him, reviewed videos of him and decided they wanted him. No doubt DP has the final say at this point. Wells was then tasked with signing him. The task is basically to convince a current, proven 29 year old NRL player with over 140 NRL appearances and a grand final winners medal to travel half way across the world to Cas. He did that.