Casforum • The Leading Castleford Tigers Community

what we thinking about the ball grab he did long ban or slap on wrist?

Ban

Grade F which carries 8+ games. Any less than 5 is an insult. Should have seen red on field.

There is no slap on the wrist for this. If found guilty its a lenghtly ban. If found not guilty he's back next week.

Watts should of rolled around in pain
Video would of looked at it and we would of won the game.

Unless Stevie Wonder on review panel he's bound to be found guilty 8 matches someone got last year for same thing I think

Mucky1978 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 19:19 Watts should of rolled around in pain
Video would of looked at it and we would of won the game.

Thats what lomax did and it worked

Looks like there was plenty to grab hold of too!

The most frustrating thing about the crown jewels incident is that if Makinson does get found guilty, Cas don't get any benefit whatsoever. I have no idea how how he could get away with it, seeing it's so clear to see.

Tigers1926 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 22:08 The most frustrating thing about the crown jewels incident is that if Makinson does get found guilty, Cas don't get any benefit whatsoever. I have no idea how how he could get away with it, seeing it's so clear to see.

I’ve said for years that one game of any suspension should be served against the team the offence was committed against.
So if Makinson gets 8 games, he should sit out the next 7 and also the next game against Cas.

That might well be next season

It's made the Fox news website in Australia,with a video clip as well.

Can't imagine what the NRL will think of the judiciary panel here if Makinson gets a small ban!

Tamworth Tiger wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 22:36 That might well be next season

Then so be it. At least the team who have suffered from the consequence of foul play will see some kind of benefit. At the moment, we are seeing clubs lose players to foul play, and the consequence of that benefits other clubs rather than the team who have suffered.
Players will also be far less inclined to commit such offences if they know it could result in them missing a final. The next Cas v Saints game could well be the Grand Final or Cup Final (optimistic I know, but we need to get a grip of some of the foul play that has been creeping in over the last few years).

I understand the idea but not sure it’s workable.e.g. Evalds sent off or suspended v us in our second league game this season
How does that work next season?

Always said the game was played with balls.

Good idea that Notts, but it involves common sense, and the rfl disciplinary don't do common sense..

nottinghamtiger wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 22:18

Tigers1926 wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 22:08 The most frustrating thing about the crown jewels incident is that if Makinson does get found guilty, Cas don't get any benefit whatsoever. I have no idea how how he could get away with it, seeing it's so clear to see.

I’ve said for years that one game of any suspension should be served against the team the offence was committed against.
So if Makinson gets 8 games, he should sit out the next 7 and also the next game against Cas.

Great idea that. Always thought it unfair when a punishment doesn’t benefit the team being played against. Also think that if Foul Play results in injury to a player, then the ban should be equal to the time the injured player is out of the game. Thoughts?

Tamworth Tiger wrote: ↑16 Aug 2020, 23:39 I understand the idea but not sure it’s workable.e.g. Evalds sent off or suspended v us in our second league game this season
How does that work next season?

Not that different to if a player is sent off and then suspended for a number of games towards the end of the season before moving clubs.
In that circumstance, I’d say reduce the suspension by one game. Or you could make him sit out the first eligible game for his new club, which is almost always a meaningless friendly.

Fair enough

Out of character Makinson do something like that I've never seen him foul anybody before