Peanut
- flood light tiger
- Academy Player
- Posts: 875
- Joined: 25 Apr 2011, 16:36
- Contact:
Peanut
Peanut as received a 2 match ban for the tackle on John wilkin not a 2 match ban offence shocking rfl back to the old tricks again penalise cas because we are near too of table
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4975
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 09:17
- Contact:
Re: Peanut
Disagree he was that late he’d of got there after a northern rail train. Had plenty of time to pull out and dropped his shoulder. Don’t think he can have any complaints luckily wilkin wasn’t injuredflood light tiger wrote: ↑03 Feb 2020, 20:53 Peanut as received a 2 match ban for the tackle on John wilkin not a 2 match ban offence shocking rfl back to the old tricks again penalise cas because we are near too of table
Re: Peanut
Deserved more so he got away with it week before big blow for us gives some one else a chance to step in. It is a shame as he was really good this week.
On another note think smithies should have got a ban hand defo moves up to face
On another note think smithies should have got a ban hand defo moves up to face
Re: Peanut
Shocking tackle, had plenty of time to pull out. Near top of table after 1 game #-oflood light tiger wrote: ↑03 Feb 2020, 20:53 Peanut as received a 2 match ban for the tackle on John wilkin not a 2 match ban offence shocking rfl back to the old tricks again penalise cas because we are near too of table
COYF!
Re: Peanut
Don't ever expect favours from the refs. They're always going to favour the money clubs.
Re: Peanut
Right decision he didn't need to n shouldn't of done it as the ball was long gone, typical cas fans on Facebook calling it a conspiracy.
CLASSY CAS FOREVER
Re: Peanut
you can not defend the indefensible, a late tackle is what he did
Re: Peanut
What would be the thought process if Morgan Smithies did that to Jake Trueman and got away with it??? Some people fail to see things objectively.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1676
- Joined: 20 Jun 2016, 08:47
- Contact:
Re: Peanut
Depends who’s doing the thinking.
Most Cas fans...the whole world is against us, Peanut didn’t get away with it but should be let off with no punishment.
All fans except Wigan’s... the RL always look after Wigan,
Most reasonable fans...how the hell has he got away with that, clearly deserved two games for a cheap late hit.
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23230
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Peanut
Seen many a late tackle like that in games.
Not seen one get a two match ban.
The ref usually deals with it on the field, resulting in a penalty.
Don’t think it was an out and out shoulder charge, just a late smash.
I will be keeping my eye out on any other late hits and see what the outcome is.
Not seen one get a two match ban.
The ref usually deals with it on the field, resulting in a penalty.
Don’t think it was an out and out shoulder charge, just a late smash.
I will be keeping my eye out on any other late hits and see what the outcome is.
Re: Peanut
Don’t have a problem with it. It was a dumb, unnecessary, play and he has got what he deserved.
Re: Peanut
Agree you will see something like that this weekend go without a ban ,he does seem to have it in him to do daft things tho i remember him getting sent off playing for leigh when they were beating leeds at fev for a ridiculous tackleold cas lass wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 10:41 Seen many a late tackle like that in games.
Not seen one get a two match ban.
The ref usually deals with it on the field, resulting in a penalty.
Don’t think it was an out and out shoulder charge, just a late smash.
I will be keeping my eye out on any other late hits and see what the outcome is.
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
Re: Peanut
It was a lazy, late tackle, fully deserved a ban.
It appears a lot of Cas fans have a chip on their shoulders.
It appears a lot of Cas fans have a chip on their shoulders.
MY CLUB. MY CAS
Re: Peanut
or a different opinion to you?
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23230
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23230
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Peanut
It deserves a ban. Anybody that thinks different wants to try and take a tackle like that where you've just relaxed your body and not expecting someone to come in and smash you.... . Maybe you'll think differently then.
2 matches is fair, Chris Hill should of got longer.
2 matches is fair, Chris Hill should of got longer.
COYF!
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23230
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Peanut
I’m not saying it doesn’t deserve a ban, I’m saying show me where another player as been banned for two games for the same tackle.Nobody wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 11:52 It deserves a ban. Anybody that thinks different wants to try and take a tackle like that where you've just relaxed your body and not expecting someone to come in and smash you.... . Maybe you'll think differently then.
2 matches is fair, Chris Hill should of got longer.
I can’t remember any, it’s usually dealt with by the ref, resulting in a penalty.
Smithies should have copped a ban due to him gouging.
But it’s Wigan so we’ll turn a blind eye.
Re: Peanut
I agree, needs to be more consistency.old cas lass wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 12:14I’m not saying it doesn’t deserve a ban, I’m saying show me where another player as been banned for two games for the same tackle.Nobody wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 11:52 It deserves a ban. Anybody that thinks different wants to try and take a tackle like that where you've just relaxed your body and not expecting someone to come in and smash you.... . Maybe you'll think differently then.
2 matches is fair, Chris Hill should of got longer.
I can’t remember any, it’s usually dealt with by the ref, resulting in a penalty.
Smithies should have copped a ban due to him gouging.
But it’s Wigan so we’ll turn a blind eye.
COYF!
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 4975
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 09:17
- Contact:
Re: Peanut
But the judiciary didn’t turn a blind eye. If you take time to read the disciplinary notes it clearly states that the video evidence was inconclusive with the footage they had available.old cas lass wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 12:14I’m not saying it doesn’t deserve a ban, I’m saying show me where another player as been banned for two games for the same tackle.Nobody wrote: ↑04 Feb 2020, 11:52 It deserves a ban. Anybody that thinks different wants to try and take a tackle like that where you've just relaxed your body and not expecting someone to come in and smash you.... . Maybe you'll think differently then.
2 matches is fair, Chris Hill should of got longer.
I can’t remember any, it’s usually dealt with by the ref, resulting in a penalty.
Smithies should have copped a ban due to him gouging.
But it’s Wigan so we’ll turn a blind eye.
I’d also point out that had smithies been caught on camera it would been all over social media which it hasn’t.
I tend to agree that as supporters we need to stop thinking we are hard done by,for the record there is a element of fans at every club that think the same.
It’s early in the season and like players the disciplinary will be keen to clamp down on certain things in the hope players clean up there act.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Mucky1978, Tamworth Tiger and 83 guests