Next.....Salford

[Flat Capper]

Again, not accurate. The penalty was given for lying on in the ruck. This happened before McShane reacted, therefore us getting the penalty was the right call

But the ref can reverse the penalty for a reaction to the original offence, seen it done many times.

[cogito ergo sum]

Again, not accurate. The penalty was given for lying on in the ruck. This happened before McShane reacted, therefore us getting the penalty was the right call

But the ref can reverse the penalty for a reaction to the original offence, seen it done many times.

I've seen a penalty reversed in RU but can't recall one in RL. Certainly nothing in the laws about penalty reversals. Many times you see players reacting, sometimes mass brawls, but the penalty still goes for the first offence.

[baldtiger]

I was impressed with Salford yesterday, the spine of that side is good and they will cause other teams lots of problems.

Hit & miss performance by us but a ugly win counts on the League table!

Just what i felt , but you put better , a ground out win n 2 points . that will do for now ..

[sparky49]

Again, not accurate. The penalty was given for lying on in the ruck. This happened before McShane reacted, therefore us getting the penalty was the right call

But the ref can reverse the penalty for a reaction to the original offence, seen it done many times.

I've seen a penalty reversed in RU but can't recall one in RL. Certainly nothing in the laws about penalty reversals. Many times you see players reacting, sometimes mass brawls, but the penalty still goes for the first offence.

The penalty decision can be reversed on the intervention of a touch judge and i have seen this done many times, as will a lot of the older supporters. Now the same should apply on the intervention of the video ref for foul play.