That’s why we love this forum, differences of opinions. Yours is that he will get into the 17, just like many others suggest. Mine is that he wouldn’t, just like many others agree. Nothing wrong with that. Doesn’t make one of us right, the other wrong. Chill out a bittallguyx wrote:As for the people saying he wouldn’t get in the 17. Of course he would.
Mitch Clark?
Re: Mitch Clark?
Re: Mitch Clark?
Well said opinions are like a---e holes everyone's got one :clap:Fumper27 wrote:That’s why we love this forum, differences of opinions. Yours is that he will get into the 17, just like many others suggest. Mine is that he wouldn’t, just like many others agree. Nothing wrong with that. Doesn’t make one of us right, the other wrong. Chill out a bittallguyx wrote:As for the people saying he wouldn’t get in the 17. Of course he would.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 3612
- Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark?
That would be my squad going in to next season.
1. Mata'tiua
2. New winger
3. Cheyse Blair
4. Shenton
5. Eden
6. Trueman
7. Gale
8. Watts
9. McShane
10. Millington
11. Foster
12. McMeekan
13. Smith
14. Moors
15. Jesse
16. Massey
17. Cook
18. Milner
19. Holmes
20. Ellis
21. Aston
22. Turner
234. O'Neill
24. Peachey
25. Storey
26. Carr
Released
Minikin
Clare
Egodo
Maher
Gill (can't see him staying even if offered deal)
1. Mata'tiua
2. New winger
3. Cheyse Blair
4. Shenton
5. Eden
6. Trueman
7. Gale
8. Watts
9. McShane
10. Millington
11. Foster
12. McMeekan
13. Smith
14. Moors
15. Jesse
16. Massey
17. Cook
18. Milner
19. Holmes
20. Ellis
21. Aston
22. Turner
234. O'Neill
24. Peachey
25. Storey
26. Carr
Released
Minikin
Clare
Egodo
Maher
Gill (can't see him staying even if offered deal)
Re: Mitch Clark?
That is a VERY thin squad, experience-wise. Take it you wouldn’t keep Clarkson either? The youngsters / inexperienced players shouldn’t be in the first 24 squad placings and I include Aston in that.heritage1926 wrote:That would be my squad going in to next season.
1. Mata'tiua
2. New winger
3. Cheyse Blair
4. Shenton
5. Eden
6. Trueman
7. Gale
8. Watts
9. McShane
10. Millington
11. Foster
12. McMeekan
13. Smith
14. Moors
15. Jesse
16. Massey
17. Cook
18. Milner
19. Holmes
20. Ellis
21. Aston
22. Turner
234. O'Neill
24. Peachey
25. Storey
26. Carr
Released
Minikin
Clare
Egodo
Maher
Gill (can't see him staying even if offered deal)
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 3612
- Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark?
I forgot to add that we need a few in to replace the ones i'd release. I've heard Clarkson is looking elsewhere as it was just till the end of the season gig for him.Fumper27 wrote:That is a VERY thin squad, experience-wise. Take it you wouldn’t keep Clarkson either? The youngsters / inexperienced players shouldn’t be in the first 24 squad placings and I include Aston in that.heritage1926 wrote:That would be my squad going in to next season.
1. Mata'tiua
2. New winger
3. Cheyse Blair
4. Shenton
5. Eden
6. Trueman
7. Gale
8. Watts
9. McShane
10. Millington
11. Foster
12. McMeekan
13. Smith
14. Moors
15. Jesse
16. Massey
17. Cook
18. Milner
19. Holmes
20. Ellis
21. Aston
22. Turner
234. O'Neill
24. Peachey
25. Storey
26. Carr
Released
Minikin
Clare
Egodo
Maher
Gill (can't see him staying even if offered deal)
Re: Mitch Clark?
Can't see Mitch clark in there eitherheritage1926 wrote:I forgot to add that we need a few in to replace the ones i'd release. I've heard Clarkson is looking elsewhere as it was just till the end of the season gig for him.Fumper27 wrote:That is a VERY thin squad, experience-wise. Take it you wouldn’t keep Clarkson either? The youngsters / inexperienced players shouldn’t be in the first 24 squad placings and I include Aston in that.heritage1926 wrote:That would be my squad going in to next season.
1. Mata'tiua
2. New winger
3. Cheyse Blair
4. Shenton
5. Eden
6. Trueman
7. Gale
8. Watts
9. McShane
10. Millington
11. Foster
12. McMeekan
13. Smith
14. Moors
15. Jesse
16. Massey
17. Cook
18. Milner
19. Holmes
20. Ellis
21. Aston
22. Turner
234. O'Neill
24. Peachey
25. Storey
26. Carr
Released
Minikin
Clare
Egodo
Maher
Gill (can't see him staying even if offered deal)
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark?
Rankin is missing (consequence of Wardle staying at Hudds) and Olpherts if the rumour is correct.
We need another forward to replace Clark and Clarkson - I wonder if we will make a play for Westerman with a view to moving Jesse/Moors into the front row. Westy was awesome out wide for us.
We need another forward to replace Clark and Clarkson - I wonder if we will make a play for Westerman with a view to moving Jesse/Moors into the front row. Westy was awesome out wide for us.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!
Re: Mitch Clark?
Westerman won't come happy where he isHuddsTigers wrote:Rankin is missing (consequence of Wardle staying at Hudds) and Olpherts if the rumour is correct.
We need another forward to replace Clark and Clarkson - I wonder if we will make a play for Westerman with a view to moving Jesse/Moors into the front row. Westy was awesome out wide for us.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 12 Mar 2012, 17:24
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark?
And he isn't staying at Hull unless things change soon because he's asked for "silly" money.Balboa1 wrote:Westerman won't come happy where he isHuddsTigers wrote:Rankin is missing (consequence of Wardle staying at Hudds) and Olpherts if the rumour is correct.
We need another forward to replace Clark and Clarkson - I wonder if we will make a play for Westerman with a view to moving Jesse/Moors into the front row. Westy was awesome out wide for us.
Re: Mitch Clark?
Told you that did he ?Balboa1 wrote:Westerman won't come happy where he isHuddsTigers wrote:Rankin is missing (consequence of Wardle staying at Hudds) and Olpherts if the rumour is correct.
We need another forward to replace Clark and Clarkson - I wonder if we will make a play for Westerman with a view to moving Jesse/Moors into the front row. Westy was awesome out wide for us.
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
Re: Mitch Clark?
Lives next door to me i fetch his paper for himtigerfeat wrote:Told you that did he ?Balboa1 wrote:Westerman won't come happy where he isHuddsTigers wrote:Rankin is missing (consequence of Wardle staying at Hudds) and Olpherts if the rumour is correct.
We need another forward to replace Clark and Clarkson - I wonder if we will make a play for Westerman with a view to moving Jesse/Moors into the front row. Westy was awesome out wide for us.
Re: Mitch Clark?
Decent starting 17 if everybody's fully fit id also have Westerman or player of that ability at 13 and can't have Mautaitia as my starting full back next seasonheritage1926 wrote:That would be my squad going in to next season.
1. Mata'tiua
2. New winger
3. Cheyse Blair
4. Shenton
5. Eden
6. Trueman
7. Gale
8. Watts
9. McShane
10. Millington
11. Foster
12. McMeekan
13. Smith
14. Moors
15. Jesse
16. Massey
17. Cook
18. Milner
19. Holmes
20. Ellis
21. Aston
22. Turner
234. O'Neill
24. Peachey
25. Storey
26. Carr
Released
Minikin
Clare
Egodo
Maher
Gill (can't see him staying even if offered deal)
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark?
Off contract and hasn’t been offered a new one yet. If he’s asking for too much Hull may move on. Already said they are looking at NRL forwards.Balboa1 wrote:Westerman won't come happy where he isHuddsTigers wrote:Rankin is missing (consequence of Wardle staying at Hudds) and Olpherts if the rumour is correct.
We need another forward to replace Clark and Clarkson - I wonder if we will make a play for Westerman with a view to moving Jesse/Moors into the front row. Westy was awesome out wide for us.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!
Re: Mitch Clark?
If Joe as grown up I would have him back in an heart beat, a few years ago fans kept reporting that he was hitting the high life most weekends , if he as settled down he would be a great asset , money talks its a commodity we don't have enough of to compete with the clubs with the big backers
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 3612
- Joined: 10 Jan 2018, 15:27
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark?
He's got 3 kids now. He hasn't time for that life anymore. Still drinks, but what players doesn't.gateman wrote:If Joe as grown up I would have him back in an heart beat, a few years ago fans kept reporting that he was hitting the high life most weekends , if he as settled down he would be a great asset , money talks its a commodity we don't have enough of to compete with the clubs with the big backers
Re: Mitch Clark?
Nice to hear mate he would be on my shopping list if we could afford himheritage1926 wrote:He's got 3 kids now. He hasn't time for that life anymore. Still drinks, but what players doesn't.gateman wrote:If Joe as grown up I would have him back in an heart beat, a few years ago fans kept reporting that he was hitting the high life most weekends , if he as settled down he would be a great asset , money talks its a commodity we don't have enough of to compete with the clubs with the big backers
Re: Mitch Clark?
Nowt like the legendary seshes in the Black Bull with rangi and co anymoreheritage1926 wrote:He's got 3 kids now. He hasn't time for that life anymore. Still drinks, but what players doesn't.gateman wrote:If Joe as grown up I would have him back in an heart beat, a few years ago fans kept reporting that he was hitting the high life most weekends , if he as settled down he would be a great asset , money talks its a commodity we don't have enough of to compete with the clubs with the big backers
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1306
- Joined: 19 Dec 2013, 18:06
- Contact:
Mitch Clark
Named in 19 today didn’t play . An article in express about him . I think he’s gonna go to Wigan soon
Re: Mitch Clark
Surprised your the first to mention “Clark to Wigan” on hereTigersbarmy wrote:Named in 19 today didn’t play . An article in express about him . I think he’s gonna go to Wigan soon
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23237
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark?
I wonder what the twist in the tale is.
Castleford Tigers director of rugby Jon Wells has opened up on speculation linking the club with a Wigan Warriors player.
In the opposite direction, Mitch Clark has already agreed a deal with Wigan for next season, but there could be a twist in the tale.
From the league express.
Castleford Tigers director of rugby Jon Wells has opened up on speculation linking the club with a Wigan Warriors player.
In the opposite direction, Mitch Clark has already agreed a deal with Wigan for next season, but there could be a twist in the tale.
From the league express.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Adsense [Bot], Beowulf, Derbyshiretiger, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MrRugby123 and 173 guests