Mitch Clark
Mitch Clark
This guy has been ripping teams to shreads down the middle every time he plays. Tonight Daryl brought him on after 14 minutes of the second half and took him off 8 minutes later and never returned! What the hell?
Re: Mitch Clark
Agree. Whe. We went 2 converted tries down I was screaming for Clark to come on and mix things up.
COYF!
- the happy hooker9
- Academy Player
- Posts: 566
- Joined: 27 Jul 2015, 14:18
- Location: Doing Spins, Backdrops and kicks on the dance floor
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark
He incurred the wrath of DP by giving a penalty away under the posts..........subsequently taken offKeithy wrote:This guy has been ripping teams to shreads down the middle every time he plays. Tonight Daryl brought him on after 14 minutes of the second half and took him off 8 minutes later and never returned! What the hell?
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 322
- Joined: 26 Feb 2018, 17:07
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark
Well every player should have been brought off then.they was all crapthe happy hooker9 wrote:He incurred the wrath of DP by giving a penalty away under the posts..........subsequently taken offKeithy wrote:This guy has been ripping teams to shreads down the middle every time he plays. Tonight Daryl brought him on after 14 minutes of the second half and took him off 8 minutes later and never returned! What the hell?
Re: Mitch Clark
didnt see him taking off webster or mcshane for all the high and cheap shots that cost us trys....or ellis for just about everything he didnt get right.....but a kid with heart trying his best gets hooked off really showed DP again as a coach who sees nothing wrong with his favourites ....perhaps he should take a closer look at where the real culprits of our abject 'performance' came from and give the kid a break......
Re: Mitch Clark
So DP was mad about someone giving 2 points away but ok with the left edge defence letting in 4 tries, unbelievable.the happy hooker9 wrote:He incurred the wrath of DP by giving a penalty away under the posts..........subsequently taken offKeithy wrote:This guy has been ripping teams to shreads down the middle every time he plays. Tonight Daryl brought him on after 14 minutes of the second half and took him off 8 minutes later and never returned! What the hell?
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 178
- Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 09:33
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark
I’d like to think he wasn’t taken off for that. All players will give penalties away...
Re: Mitch Clark
I really felt for Mitch and he was clearly disappointed at getting hooked and didn’t want to go off. The player was falling in the tackle and he caught him high as he was going down. Bit of an unlucky one for mine. It sometimes appears that the regular untouchable players in our team get a lot more leeway than some of the newbies.
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark
correct Daytona you could see young mitch was beating himself up over giving the penalty away so there was no need to bring him off as he knew he'd done wrong. in fact if he'd been left on he's the type of player that would have bust a gut to make up for his mistake.
jo brand is eddie warings love child
Re: Mitch Clark
That's not good from Powell if he did that the real culprits when we were 12 zip up and in total control were macca and Webster stupid swinging arms letting them get a foothold in the game and having a laugh about it at the same time
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
Re: Mitch Clark
tigerfeat wrote:That's not good from Powell if he did that the real culprits when we were 12 zip up and in total control were macca and Webster stupid swinging arms letting them get a foothold in the game and having a laugh about it at the same time
he does it regularly. He has his favourites. Green was taken off at St Helens because it was the easy option.
Re: Mitch Clark
Or junior moors for yet another week pretending to be a halve and throwing yet more crap passes and dropping off tacklestigerfeat wrote:That's not good from Powell if he did that the real culprits when we were 12 zip up and in total control were macca and Webster stupid swinging arms letting them get a foothold in the game and having a laugh about it at the same time
- the machine
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10135
- Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:21
- Twitter: @dphartshorne
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark
He did the same with green against Saints, look how he went after thatthe happy hooker9 wrote:He incurred the wrath of DP by giving a penalty away under the posts..........subsequently taken offKeithy wrote:This guy has been ripping teams to shreads down the middle every time he plays. Tonight Daryl brought him on after 14 minutes of the second half and took him off 8 minutes later and never returned! What the hell?
"I can accept failure. Everyone fails at something, but I cannot accept not trying"
Michael Jordan
Michael Jordan
Re: Mitch Clark
Thats just bo**ox but if it was due to that we should have had about 4 players on the field.the happy hooker9 wrote:He incurred the wrath of DP by giving a penalty away under the posts..........subsequently taken offKeithy wrote:This guy has been ripping teams to shreads down the middle every time he plays. Tonight Daryl brought him on after 14 minutes of the second half and took him off 8 minutes later and never returned! What the hell?
TBH DP and his decisions sometimes is getting on my [REMOVED] and im fed up of it. Dont care what anybody says about him and what hes done.
Some players can just seem to do no wrong and others get dropped and subbed for looking the wrong way.
Re: Mitch Clark
Exactly not good DPthe machine wrote:He did the same with green against Saints, look how he went after thatthe happy hooker9 wrote:He incurred the wrath of DP by giving a penalty away under the posts..........subsequently taken offKeithy wrote:This guy has been ripping teams to shreads down the middle every time he plays. Tonight Daryl brought him on after 14 minutes of the second half and took him off 8 minutes later and never returned! What the hell?
Re: Mitch Clark
Or could it be that after 63 minutes we had used all of our 10 substitutions????
Re: Mitch Clark
Fumper27 wrote:Or could it be that after 63 minutes we had used all of our 10 substitutions????
he used two by bringing Mitch on for 10 mins.
- corvusxiii
- Academy Player
- Posts: 226
- Joined: 28 Sep 2016, 19:52
- Location: Redhill.
- Contact:
Re: Mitch Clark
There is a definite trend here. Subs on the bench either playing short minutes or not at all. Can't do their confidence any good. If they are not good enough then why are they on the bench? I think this is a valid/reasonable question. Didn't see the match last night, but we'll done Huddersfield.
To finish last in the Tour de France, first you must finish.
Re: Mitch Clark
I would agree. Clark would have been more useful than Shenton or Ellis last night if we’d shuffled the team about and catered for it. Or, instead of Moors or Holmes even!
Daryl does have a problem some times I can’t work it out myself re the unused sub? It’s almost a disadvantage!
What is also very clear is that DP can’t talk well after a loss. He really struggles with his usual unflappability after a defeat. Watch.
Daryl does have a problem some times I can’t work it out myself re the unused sub? It’s almost a disadvantage!
What is also very clear is that DP can’t talk well after a loss. He really struggles with his usual unflappability after a defeat. Watch.
Audacter Et Sincere
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Wallystar and 56 guests