it wasn't late though, it was 2 seconds early.mart0042 wrote:Thought Radford in the after match interview was good. Apologising for such a brutal game.
There was sombre shocking stuff, the red card was dumb by the player. The late shot on shaul should have at least been a yellow. Connor got sinbinned for being himself but had a good game showing he's a good player and able to run a game.
Liked like a few injuries for Hull aswell.
Fev
-
lurcher Verified
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10676
- Joined: 19 Aug 2010, 23:25
- Location: bridlington
- Contact:
Re: Fev
jo brand is eddie warings love child
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 27 Nov 2017, 21:43
- Contact:
Re: Fev
My view on the game:https://uk.blastingnews.com/sport/2018/ ... 66727.html
Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting
Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: Fev
Again - you’ve been asked by the moderators and administrators to put these on your own special thread and not populate almost every thread with your links.callum_walker wrote:My view on the game:https://uk.blastingnews.com/sport/2018/ ... 66727.html
Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting
You are abusing the forum to generate clicks on your own external site.
Got to be close to a ban, surely? He’s just using to forum for his own gain, diverting traffic away from the forum and onto his own site.
I don’t want to visit a forum where every thread is diverted by someone who is only using it for clicks.
I also doubt Callum will read this as he’s now done the only thing he is using the forum for and posted his link!
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: 22 Jun 2012, 16:48
- Contact:
Re: Fev
Brutal,Fev gave a good account of themselves.
Disappointing crowd.
Tom Holmes had a great game.
The referee had no control kept telling both captains to talk to their players.
Disallowed what to me seemed a perfectly good try for Fev.
A lot of injuries for FC
Probably need to do overtime to get through the disciplinary proceedings.
Jake Connor never see in the same room as Mr Bean.
Disappointing crowd.
Tom Holmes had a great game.
The referee had no control kept telling both captains to talk to their players.
Disallowed what to me seemed a perfectly good try for Fev.
A lot of injuries for FC
Probably need to do overtime to get through the disciplinary proceedings.
Jake Connor never see in the same room as Mr Bean.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 27 Nov 2017, 21:43
- Contact:
Re: Fev
I'll delete the linknottinghamtiger wrote:Again - you’ve been asked by the moderators and administrators to put these on your own special thread and not populate almost every thread with your links.callum_walker wrote:My view on the game:https://uk.blastingnews.com/sport/2018/ ... 66727.html
Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting
You are abusing the forum to generate clicks on your own external site.
Got to be close to a ban, surely? He’s just using to forum for his own gain, diverting traffic away from the forum and onto his own site.
I don’t want to visit a forum where every thread is diverted by someone who is only using it for clicks.
I also doubt Callum will read this as he’s now done the only thing he is using the forum for and posted his link!
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: 22 Jun 2012, 16:48
- Contact:
Re: Fev
According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.
Re: Fev
Is 8 the cut off point?casjunction wrote:According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.
I thought it was something ridiculous like 4
-
Verified
- Moderator
- Posts: 885
- Joined: 21 Dec 2016, 20:09
- Contact:
Re: Fev
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:nottinghamtiger wrote:Again - you’ve been asked by the moderators and administrators to put these on your own special thread and not populate almost every thread with your links.callum_walker wrote:My view on the game:https://uk.blastingnews.com/sport/2018/ ... 66727.html
Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting
You are abusing the forum to generate clicks on your own external site.
Got to be close to a ban, surely? He’s just using to forum for his own gain, diverting traffic away from the forum and onto his own site.
I don’t want to visit a forum where every thread is diverted by someone who is only using it for clicks.
I also doubt Callum will read this as he’s now done the only thing he is using the forum for and posted his link!
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2811
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 18:35
- Twitter: @nathastbury
- Location: Greystones, County Wicklow
- Contact:
Re: Fev
I believe it's 5lidds wrote:Is 8 the cut off point?casjunction wrote:According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.
I thought it was something ridiculous like 4
Castleford tigers Irish supporters branch
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 7389
- Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
- Contact:
Re: Fev
According to Hull Daily Mail Article it’s 4
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23227
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Fev
So nobody really knows officially.
Re: Fev
Your can play with 5, but once your down to 4 it's game over. Not sure where everyone seems to be plucking 8 from. Think they are getting confused with the amount you need to START a game (which I believe is 9, hence where the 'cant play with 8' is coming from)Mr XP wrote:I believe it's 5lidds wrote:Is 8 the cut off point?casjunction wrote:According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.
I thought it was something ridiculous like 4
Re: Fev
5 vs 5! Sounds a right game.lidds wrote:Your can play with 5, but once your down to 4 it's game over. Not sure where everyone seems to be plucking 8 from. Think they are getting confused with the amount you need to START a game (which I believe is 9, hence where the 'cant play with 8' is coming from)Mr XP wrote:I believe it's 5lidds wrote:Is 8 the cut off point?casjunction wrote:According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.
I thought it was something ridiculous like 4
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: 11 Apr 2013, 01:42
- Contact:
Re: Fev
Not sure where all these numbers are coming from. When I refereed (Ok a few years ago now) the minimum was 10. When a scrum is formed you have to have 7 backs out of the scrum. You can from a scrum ( non competative) with a minimum of 3 players. So 7 backs and 3 forwards = 10 players. Any less game over. So don't really know how hull managed to play with only 9
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: 17 Sep 2016, 10:17
- Contact:
Re: Fev
You maybe right , but the rules might differ between players been sin binned and actually sent off .chesterfieldtiger wrote:Not sure where all these numbers are coming from. When I refereed (Ok a few years ago now) the minimum was 10. When a scrum is formed you have to have 7 backs out of the scrum. You can from a scrum ( non competative) with a minimum of 3 players. So 7 backs and 3 forwards = 10 players. Any less game over. So don't really know how hull managed to play with only 9
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: 11 Apr 2013, 01:42
- Contact:
Re: Fev
Yeah probably mate
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 7389
- Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
- Contact:
Re: Fev
The Hull Daily Mail article says that Gareth Walker Sports writer for the Mirror looked it up in RL rules.old cas lass wrote:So nobody really knows officially.
It’s to do with having enough to make the front row of a scrum and one to feed it. The trouble is I’m sure that only needs 4 people and he says the minimum is 5 !!
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: Fev
It would also mean the scrum half would have to feed the ball into the front row. Now that would be a novelty.Tamworth Tiger wrote:The Hull Daily Mail article says that Gareth Walker Sports writer for the Mirror looked it up in RL rules.old cas lass wrote:So nobody really knows officially.
It’s to do with having enough to make the front row of a scrum and one to feed it. The trouble is I’m sure that only needs 4 people and he says the minimum is 5 !!
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: 11 Apr 2013, 01:42
- Contact:
Re: Fev
Like I said before there has to be 7 backs out of the scrum so I don't get it
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 7389
- Joined: 07 Jul 2006, 16:29
- Contact:
Re: Fev
Hahanottinghamtiger wrote:It would also mean the scrum half would have to feed the ball into the front row. Now that would be a novelty.Tamworth Tiger wrote:The Hull Daily Mail article says that Gareth Walker Sports writer for the Mirror looked it up in RL rules.old cas lass wrote:So nobody really knows officially.
It’s to do with having enough to make the front row of a scrum and one to feed it. The trouble is I’m sure that only needs 4 people and he says the minimum is 5 !!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 18 guests