19 for hudds
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 793
- Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 20:25
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Eden
Monos
Shenton
Webster
Minikin
Chase
Mcshane
Holmes
Millington
Massey
JSL
Milner
Springer
Laroyer
Cook
Moors
Foster
That would be mine and still a strong squad compared to what we have had in past years
Monos
Shenton
Webster
Minikin
Chase
Mcshane
Holmes
Millington
Massey
JSL
Milner
Springer
Laroyer
Cook
Moors
Foster
That would be mine and still a strong squad compared to what we have had in past years
Re: 19 for hudds
Wouldn't play Tom Holmes at prop?Bolton-tiger wrote:Eden
Monos
Shenton
Webster
Minikin
Chase
Mcshane
Holmes
Millington
Massey
JSL
Milner
Springer
Laroyer
Cook
Moors
Foster
That would be mine and still a strong squad compared to what we have had in past years
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 793
- Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 20:25
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
No oggy holmes not tom
Re: 19 for hudds
He's not in the 19
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Interesting a lot of people are selecting Foster. On what premise? For me, Larroyer is a better bet.
Foster has been working his way back from injury and has no match fitness. Larroyer has been playing in a Bradford side and is ready to rock and roll.
Foster has been working his way back from injury and has no match fitness. Larroyer has been playing in a Bradford side and is ready to rock and roll.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: Stadium Update
Apologies Robbo. I have been busy outside of Casforum.
First of all, let's address the elephant in the room that we're approaching this from two different angles. I'm extremely positive and back the club, and also believe the development will 100% happen.
You have a half-empty attitude and constantly ridicule the club at every opportunity and believe you can do better. You also are very skeptical about anything the club does and the development as a whole. Moreover, you come in with a vested interest of having your own business, which understandably you want to prioritise. However, it clouds your judgement too.
What I would suggest is that Lateral are being very conservative. They have to be. It's clear from their statement they don't want to overpromise. That being said, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest that there is more than meets the eye to this situation. You, I, nor anyone else on here knows where the land lies, nor have we seen any of the contractual information. It's a guessing game from our standpoint.
However, what information I have passed on is already out there in the public domain. People can interpret it how they want. There's no spin, there's no manipulation of the truth. I could be wrong, I could be right. Either way, I'm fully confident the development will happen and I'm confident that "2020" wouldn't have been mentioned unless they were absolutely certain it was going to happen by the end of 2020.
In relation to funding, it's pretty clear that a lot of the planning hurdles had to be resolved before they could push on with the pension provider. You wouldn't throw out a load of cash if there wasn't the interest there, nor that it would make sense from an investment point of view that you were guaranteed to get your cash back. A lot of those have been resolved and a few more planning points are currently in situ.
Either way, groundworks are going to begin and so is coal extraction.
First of all, let's address the elephant in the room that we're approaching this from two different angles. I'm extremely positive and back the club, and also believe the development will 100% happen.
You have a half-empty attitude and constantly ridicule the club at every opportunity and believe you can do better. You also are very skeptical about anything the club does and the development as a whole. Moreover, you come in with a vested interest of having your own business, which understandably you want to prioritise. However, it clouds your judgement too.
What I would suggest is that Lateral are being very conservative. They have to be. It's clear from their statement they don't want to overpromise. That being said, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest that there is more than meets the eye to this situation. You, I, nor anyone else on here knows where the land lies, nor have we seen any of the contractual information. It's a guessing game from our standpoint.
However, what information I have passed on is already out there in the public domain. People can interpret it how they want. There's no spin, there's no manipulation of the truth. I could be wrong, I could be right. Either way, I'm fully confident the development will happen and I'm confident that "2020" wouldn't have been mentioned unless they were absolutely certain it was going to happen by the end of 2020.
In relation to funding, it's pretty clear that a lot of the planning hurdles had to be resolved before they could push on with the pension provider. You wouldn't throw out a load of cash if there wasn't the interest there, nor that it would make sense from an investment point of view that you were guaranteed to get your cash back. A lot of those have been resolved and a few more planning points are currently in situ.
Either way, groundworks are going to begin and so is coal extraction.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!
Re: 19 for hudds
I think that's why Powell has kept monners in the squared fro the last couple of week so his body is still up to the pace of super league.
-
Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15893
- Joined: 31 Jan 2009, 03:55
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
I would also point out that we saw out the game on Saturday with McShane and Chase in the halves and Monaghan on the left-wing. DP perhaps trialing it knowing that this he was probably lining up with this week?TT Tiger wrote:I think that's why Powell has kept monners in the squared fro the last couple of week so his body is still up to the pace of super league.
In the spirit of the final Blackadder episode - Goooodbyeee!
Re: Stadium Update
Don't know about the funding or anything else but I have been told that "100% Cas will have a new stadium from GMI at this site"
This is from a freind that is 1 of the heads at gmi. it's going to be eco friendly and hopefully have us playing there by the end of 2020. He says they have invested too much into it to go back on it now.
This is from a freind that is 1 of the heads at gmi. it's going to be eco friendly and hopefully have us playing there by the end of 2020. He says they have invested too much into it to go back on it now.
- the machine
- Super League Player
- Posts: 10144
- Joined: 08 Jan 2012, 21:21
- Twitter: @dphartshorne
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Eden
Minikin
Webster
Joel
Shenton
Chase
T.holmes
Massey
mcshane
millo
JSL
Larroyer
Milner
Springer
Cook
Moors
Foster
lynch
Gill
Minikin
Webster
Joel
Shenton
Chase
T.holmes
Massey
mcshane
millo
JSL
Larroyer
Milner
Springer
Cook
Moors
Foster
lynch
Gill
"I can accept failure. Everyone fails at something, but I cannot accept not trying"
Michael Jordan
Michael Jordan
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23230
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Anyone know what's up with oli Holmes
Injured or just not selected.
Injured or just not selected.
Re: 19 for hudds
old cas lass wrote:Anyone know what's up with oli Holmes
Injured or just not selected.
Didn't warm up on Saturday so tipping injured.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 753
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 09:57
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Lynchy put a pic on Instagram saying "Great session with the injured Cas lads in Wakey" Oli Holmes was on the picture.old cas lass wrote:Anyone know what's up with oli Holmes
Injured or just not selected.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: 12 Mar 2012, 17:24
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Tom Holmes has to play this game, if he can't be trusted at this point to be adequate cover then there's no point of him being in the squad.
Keep as many players as possible in the correct position, don't move people around for the sake of it when there's the correct players already in the squad ready to play.
Keep as many players as possible in the correct position, don't move people around for the sake of it when there's the correct players already in the squad ready to play.
Re: 19 for hudds
Eden
Monaghan
Webster
Shenton
Minikin
Chase
Mcshane
Lynch
Milner
Springer
Millington
Jesse
Massey
Holmes
Cook
Moors
Loroyer/foster dependent on who impresses most in training
Monaghan
Webster
Shenton
Minikin
Chase
Mcshane
Lynch
Milner
Springer
Millington
Jesse
Massey
Holmes
Cook
Moors
Loroyer/foster dependent on who impresses most in training
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23230
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Ben Thaler ref.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: 17 Sep 2016, 10:17
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Yes but it was only because we were miles clear on the scoreboard . There was no danger whatsoever by bringing Gale off . In an ideal world I'd like Milner at 13 , McShane at 9 and Holmes partnering Chase , but like a previous poster said , I'm not the coach of the best team in the country .HuddsTigers wrote:I would also point out that we saw out the game on Saturday with McShane and Chase in the halves and Monaghan on the left-wing. DP perhaps trialing it knowing that this he was probably lining up with this week?TT Tiger wrote:I think that's why Powell has kept monners in the squared fro the last couple of week so his body is still up to the pace of super league.
Re: 19 for hudds
I get what you mean but also foster can cover centre too which makes him pretty handy for the benchHuddsTigers wrote:Interesting a lot of people are selecting Foster. On what premise? For me, Larroyer is a better bet.
Foster has been working his way back from injury and has no match fitness. Larroyer has been playing in a Bradford side and is ready to rock and roll.
I've complete faith in dp to pick the best fit for the teams needs
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 753
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 09:57
- Contact:
Re: 19 for hudds
Dont mind Ben when it comes to Sky games.old cas lass wrote:Ben Thaler ref.
Re: 19 for hudds
two half backs down Tom Holmes must play, the lad as done every thing asked of him going by the reports from Batley
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: LeeThorpe88, MrRugby123 and 116 guests