Casforum • The Leading Castleford Tigers Community

Thought Radford in the after match interview was good. Apologising for such a brutal game.

There was sombre shocking stuff, the red card was dumb by the player. The late shot on shaul should have at least been a yellow. Connor got sinbinned for being himself but had a good game showing he's a good player and able to run a game.

Liked like a few injuries for Hull aswell.

tigerfeat wrote:He wouldnt have being winding players up 20 30 years ago hed have being carried from the field on a stretcher every game

Lol. Very true!

yorky wrote:

lurcher wrote:6 yellows and 1 red card. probably more to follow after the skirmish in the final seconds. I'd buy a pint for the 1st player to smash connor, absolute grub.

why aren't the rugby league investigating connors behaviour, even the sky team talk about the way hes winding players up, the mans a psycho

I strongly disliked him when he came onto the scene at Huddersfield. I hate his smug grinning at players and laughing and goading of them. It's very unprofessional and to be honest i'd be embarrassed of him if i were his teammate.

To be fair there are rules in eth game to stop behaviour like that - un-gentlemanly conduct and bringing the game into disrupt - however like actually playing the ball at the ruck/ faking injury/ deliberately throwing the ball at a player on the floor at the ruck, these things are very rarely penalised.

If you really want to outlaw it in the game just penalise it a couple of times and players would stop doing it.

Brutal,Fev gave a good account of themselves.
Disappointing crowd.
Tom Holmes had a great game.
The referee had no control kept telling both captains to talk to their players.
Disallowed what to me seemed a perfectly good try for Fev.
A lot of injuries for FC
Probably need to do overtime to get through the disciplinary proceedings.
Jake Connor never see in the same room as Mr Bean.

mart0042 wrote:Thought Radford in the after match interview was good. Apologising for such a brutal game.

There was sombre shocking stuff, the red card was dumb by the player. The late shot on shaul should have at least been a yellow. Connor got sinbinned for being himself but had a good game showing he's a good player and able to run a game.

Liked like a few injuries for Hull aswell.

it wasn't late though, it was 2 seconds early.

My view on the game:https://uk.blastingnews.com/sport/2018/ ... 66727.html

Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting

callum_walker wrote:My view on the game:https://uk.blastingnews.com/sport/2018/ ... 66727.html

Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting

Again - you’ve been asked by the moderators and administrators to put these on your own special thread and not populate almost every thread with your links.
You are abusing the forum to generate clicks on your own external site.
Got to be close to a ban, surely? He’s just using to forum for his own gain, diverting traffic away from the forum and onto his own site.
I don’t want to visit a forum where every thread is diverted by someone who is only using it for clicks.
I also doubt Callum will read this as he’s now done the only thing he is using the forum for and posted his link!

Brutal,Fev gave a good account of themselves.
Disappointing crowd.
Tom Holmes had a great game.
The referee had no control kept telling both captains to talk to their players.
Disallowed what to me seemed a perfectly good try for Fev.
A lot of injuries for FC
Probably need to do overtime to get through the disciplinary proceedings.
Jake Connor never see in the same room as Mr Bean.

nottinghamtiger wrote:

callum_walker wrote:My view on the game:https://uk.blastingnews.com/sport/2018/ ... 66727.html

Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting

Again - you’ve been asked by the moderators and administrators to put these on your own special thread and not populate almost every thread with your links.
You are abusing the forum to generate clicks on your own external site.
Got to be close to a ban, surely? He’s just using to forum for his own gain, diverting traffic away from the forum and onto his own site.
I don’t want to visit a forum where every thread is diverted by someone who is only using it for clicks.
I also doubt Callum will read this as he’s now done the only thing he is using the forum for and posted his link!

I'll delete the link

According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.

casjunction wrote:According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.

Is 8 the cut off point?
I thought it was something ridiculous like 4

nottinghamtiger wrote:

callum_walker wrote:My view on the game:https://uk.blastingnews.com/sport/2018/ ... 66727.html

Entertaining, but Taulapapa's and Faraimo's hits disgusting

Again - you’ve been asked by the moderators and administrators to put these on your own special thread and not populate almost every thread with your links.
You are abusing the forum to generate clicks on your own external site.
Got to be close to a ban, surely? He’s just using to forum for his own gain, diverting traffic away from the forum and onto his own site.
I don’t want to visit a forum where every thread is diverted by someone who is only using it for clicks.
I also doubt Callum will read this as he’s now done the only thing he is using the forum for and posted his link!

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

lidds wrote:

casjunction wrote:According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.

Is 8 the cut off point?
I thought it was something ridiculous like 4

I believe it's 5

According to Hull Daily Mail Article it’s 4

So nobody really knows officially.

Mr XP wrote:

lidds wrote:

casjunction wrote:According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.

Is 8 the cut off point?
I thought it was something ridiculous like 4

I believe it's 5

Your can play with 5, but once your down to 4 it's game over. Not sure where everyone seems to be plucking 8 from. Think they are getting confused with the amount you need to START a game (which I believe is 9, hence where the 'cant play with 8' is coming from)

lidds wrote:

Mr XP wrote:

lidds wrote:

casjunction wrote:According to my daughter if FC had had another player binned in the dying seconds they would have had to forfeit the game as they would have had only eight players on the field.

Is 8 the cut off point?
I thought it was something ridiculous like 4

I believe it's 5

Your can play with 5, but once your down to 4 it's game over. Not sure where everyone seems to be plucking 8 from. Think they are getting confused with the amount you need to START a game (which I believe is 9, hence where the 'cant play with 8' is coming from)

5 vs 5! Sounds a right game.

Not sure where all these numbers are coming from. When I refereed (Ok a few years ago now) the minimum was 10. When a scrum is formed you have to have 7 backs out of the scrum. You can from a scrum ( non competative) with a minimum of 3 players. So 7 backs and 3 forwards = 10 players. Any less game over. So don't really know how hull managed to play with only 9

chesterfieldtiger wrote:Not sure where all these numbers are coming from. When I refereed (Ok a few years ago now) the minimum was 10. When a scrum is formed you have to have 7 backs out of the scrum. You can from a scrum ( non competative) with a minimum of 3 players. So 7 backs and 3 forwards = 10 players. Any less game over. So don't really know how hull managed to play with only 9

You maybe right , but the rules might differ between players been sin binned and actually sent off .