They are only first teamers because the other guys are injured, that my point,old cas lass wrote:glasshoughtontiger wrote:It's alright saying all these are missing but these guys should still be able to tackle?
Yep thats my point.
These players are 1st teamers.
We cave in to easy.
Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
Burrow again 46-0
Suffering from Alzheimer's is just like watching errrrr what was it.
- glasshoughtontiger
- New member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 09:21
- Contact:
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
I expected us to loose but not to get humiliated. I accept they're missing but the shoreline is ridiculous imo.
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23239
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
Thats why every club have a squad, we have a squad of 30, 11 out leaves 19.El Nino wrote:
They are only first teamers because the other guys are injured, that my point,
Them 19 should be capable of giving and competing against any club. Not bloody cave in.
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
shoreline ??? think too many of the players are ready for a holiday lol
Suffering from Alzheimer's is just like watching errrrr what was it.
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
48-0
Suffering from Alzheimer's is just like watching errrrr what was it.
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
Maguire 52-0
Suffering from Alzheimer's is just like watching errrrr what was it.
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
this is a shocking reaction to last weekend. missing players or not this is a disgrace.
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23239
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
gavsdad wrote:shoreline ??? think too many of the players are ready for a holiday lol
Them players get a wage to play 27 SL game plus any others in CC or SL play off's.
They need to get a grip and knuckle down.
Cos the way we are heading we wont finish top 8.
I hope to god we arnt gonna let the CC semi spoil our season.
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
You are missing the point! The players missing aren'told cas lass wrote:Thats why every club have a squad, we have a squad of 30, 11 out leaves 19.El Nino wrote:
They are only first teamers because the other guys are injured, that my point,
Them 19 should be capable of giving and competing against any club. Not bloody cave in.
only squad members they are in the starting 13 every week if fit.
And why should they capable of competing? Most of them are local lads under 20, we don't have the resources to have a squad of 20+ internationals.
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
every cas supporter knows the Leeds fixtures are the biggest of the year and so should the players, to just roll over as we appear to have done is a disgrace.
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
G Price gets on my nerves i helped coach at Wakie when he was there an all he could do was model leather jackets with Jacko most over rated player to pull on a shirt an now he gets to summerise on players that can play if only abit tonight
Suffering from Alzheimer's is just like watching errrrr what was it.
- glasshoughtontiger
- New member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 09:21
- Contact:
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
Well if they aren't gonna compete why play?El Nino wrote:You are missing the point! The players missing only squad members they are in the starting 13 every week if fit.old cas lass wrote:Thats why every club have a squad, we have a squad of 30, 11 out leaves 19.El Nino wrote:
They are only first teamers because the other guys are injured, that my point,
Them 19 should be capable of giving and competing against any club. Not bloody cave in.
And why should they capable of competing? Most of them are local lads under 20, we don't have the resources to have a squad of 20+ internationals.
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23239
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
You dont need 20 internationals.
You need players with heart.
Tonight we've caved in conceded.
Been nothing but disgraceful.
52 points against and a zilch against our name.
[-X
You need players with heart.
Tonight we've caved in conceded.
Been nothing but disgraceful.
52 points against and a zilch against our name.
[-X
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
Webb 56-0
10 tries now
10 tries now
Suffering from Alzheimer's is just like watching errrrr what was it.
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
its a good job we didnt get to wembly, getting beat 70 to nil wouldnt have looked good on tv ](*,)
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
I'm not saying I'm happy with what's happened tonight, far from it. What I'm saying is that it's got to be put into context, it wasn't a level playing field tonight for various reasons and it's showed. Roll on the Pussycats next week.old cas lass wrote:You dont need 20 internationals.
You need players with heart.
Tonight we've caved in conceded.
Been nothing but disgraceful.
52 points against and a zilch against our name.
[-X
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
56-0 FT
Suffering from Alzheimer's is just like watching errrrr what was it.
- Panthers4eva
- Academy Player
- Posts: 826
- Joined: 05 Jul 2006, 18:55
- Location: CASTLEFORD!!!!
- Contact:
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
We could still quite easily drop out of the 8 - Hull Kr v Bulls tomorrow - Hull Kr win they are 2 points behind us. Last week could well and truely have taken the wind out of our sails.
THE FUTURES BRIGHT - THE FUTURES AMBER!!!! :-)
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23239
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Rhinos v Tigers (12/08/11)
So roll on the pussycats next week hey.
The pusseycats will be licking there lips.
They will be well and truely up for it.
I fear for next week kear will have them fired up, even with rangi back how can we compete with 11 out.
Or will we have some back.
I'm to dejected to care.
The pusseycats will be licking there lips.
They will be well and truely up for it.
I fear for next week kear will have them fired up, even with rangi back how can we compete with 11 out.
Or will we have some back.
I'm to dejected to care.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests