Hardaker
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 560
- Joined: 22 Aug 2017, 21:10
- Contact:
Hardaker
Anybody heard anything yet?
Re: Hardaker
got teld wigan made him a good offer but hes staying at cas
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
Re: Hardaker
Officially Wigan can’t approach because of 1, his suspension and 2, they’d have to ask permission to speak to him, and, I know they haven’t done that. I wouldn’t put it past those pie eating scum to try under hand tactics though, it’d, be typical of them.tigerfeat wrote:got teld wigan made him a good offer but hes staying at cas
what doesn't kill me simply makes me...stranger.
Re: Hardaker
Yep somebody will have had a word testing out water
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
Re: Hardaker
If that rumour is correct would that suggest that Wigan don't think that Hardaker is going to get a ban?
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 793
- Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 20:25
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
JIN JER wrote:If that rumour is correct would that suggest that Wigan don't think that Hardaker is going to get a ban?
If so then i would love to see him stay at cas and earn the team and fans respect back by playin well on the field and not run of to another club
-
old cas lass Verified
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 23237
- Joined: 26 Dec 2007, 14:29
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
Don’t really say much tbh, nothing we don’t know.Tigerade wrote:Update from the club on ZH here :-
https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/ ... -1-8908563
No decision can be made until his ban is known.
- Tigerade
- League One Player
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: 11 Dec 2014, 13:18
- Location: Larging it in Lagentium
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
I have just heard something similar about Wigan. They have made him an offer but he has turned them down. Toronto have offered him a deal that see's him get paid what he is on now whist he is banned (if that is allowed ??). I recon he will end up a Toronto.tigerfeat wrote:got teld wigan made him a good offer but hes staying at cas
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 793
- Joined: 29 Apr 2017, 20:25
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
Well i hope none of these are true and hope he sticks by the clubs like the club is standing by him and repay them back fpr whats happend.hel not be the same player under a different coach.dp gets the best out of him
Re: Hardaker
Wigan or somebody acting for them offered something the same wether it was as much as toronto i dont knowTigerade wrote:I have just heard something similar about Wigan. They have made him an offer but he has turned them down. Toronto have offered him a deal that see's him get paid what he is on now whist he is banned (if that is allowed ??). I recon he will end up a Toronto.tigerfeat wrote:got teld wigan made him a good offer but hes staying at cas
i think he will stay at cas mesen
The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have
Vince Lombardi
Vince Lombardi
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2986
- Joined: 21 Dec 2014, 00:40
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
If someone wants to pay him full salary for sitting on his ar5e doing nowt for the next 2 years then let them buy his contract out and have him (just buying his contract out for the 2 years he can play will recoup our money and then some). If the offer was on the table and I was in Steve Gills position I’d take the money and ZH wouldn’t have any say in it. I dont know what he’s on a year, but even at 100 grand (I’d guess a lot more though) we’d be 50 grand up on him selling his 2 remaining years. Off the wage bill, off the cap and a few quid made. Job done.tigerfeat wrote:Wigan or somebody acting for them offered something the same wether it was as much as toronto i dont knowTigerade wrote:I have just heard something similar about Wigan. They have made him an offer but he has turned them down. Toronto have offered him a deal that see's him get paid what he is on now whist he is banned (if that is allowed ??). I recon he will end up a Toronto.tigerfeat wrote:got teld wigan made him a good offer but hes staying at cas
i think he will stay at cas mesen
- Tigerade
- League One Player
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: 11 Dec 2014, 13:18
- Location: Larging it in Lagentium
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
That would be a good bit of business but I don't think we are in the driving seat on this one. Wigan (or Toronto) will want him for next to nothing. We are lumbered with a player on a huge contract who looks likely to be getting a 2 year ban from the sport. As it is now - we are stuck with the problem - not them. It's like the Justin Carney scenario all over again. The buying club hold the upper hand.If someone wants to pay him full salary for sitting on his ar5e doing nowt for the next 2 years then let them buy his contract out and have him (just buying his contract out for the 2 years he can play will recoup our money and then some). If the offer was on the table and I was in Steve Gills position I’d take the money and ZH wouldn’t have any say in it. I dont know what he’s on a year, but even at 100 grand (I’d guess a lot more though) we’d be 50 grand up on him selling his 2 remaining years. Off the wage bill, off the cap and a few quid made. Job done.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2986
- Joined: 21 Dec 2014, 00:40
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
Perez may think its an investment for the future. I agree the buyer holds all the aces and can't see Wigan wanting to part with a penny. Toronto, on the other hand, just might. The post was a little 'wishful thinking' to be honest, hence the 'if the offer was on the table' comment. Having thought about it a little more though, Perez doesn't seem to mind spending 'investment money', and they are aiming to be in SL by the time ZH's potential ban is up. Stranger things have happened :pray:Tigerade wrote:That would be a good bit of business but I don't think we are in the driving seat on this one. Wigan (or Toronto) will want him for next to nothing. We are lumbered with a player on a huge contract who looks likely to be getting a 2 year ban from the sport. As it is now - we are stuck with the problem - not them. It's like the Justin Carney scenario all over again. The buying club hold the upper hand.If someone wants to pay him full salary for sitting on his ar5e doing nowt for the next 2 years then let them buy his contract out and have him (just buying his contract out for the 2 years he can play will recoup our money and then some). If the offer was on the table and I was in Steve Gills position I’d take the money and ZH wouldn’t have any say in it. I dont know what he’s on a year, but even at 100 grand (I’d guess a lot more though) we’d be 50 grand up on him selling his 2 remaining years. Off the wage bill, off the cap and a few quid made. Job done.
- Tigerade
- League One Player
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: 11 Dec 2014, 13:18
- Location: Larging it in Lagentium
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
Agreed - If Perez wants to part with some serious cash we should take it. Of course Zak would have to want to go to Toronto but from what I have heard he is open to offers.
- mart0042
- Championship Player
- Posts: 6355
- Joined: 24 May 2007, 15:06
- Location: behind the table in the lab deep under Racoon City.....
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
Unless we sack him or release him, he isn't open to anything. He's a Cas employee.Tigerade wrote:Agreed - If Perez wants to part with some serious cash we should take it. Of course Zak would have to want to go to Toronto but from what I have heard he is open to offers.
I just hope we find out what is gale of and then we can plan and move on. Until then we are stuck
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2986
- Joined: 21 Dec 2014, 00:40
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
Unless we have given him permission to speak to other people?mart0042 wrote:Unless we sack him or release him, he isn't open to anything. He's a Cas employee.Tigerade wrote:Agreed - If Perez wants to part with some serious cash we should take it. Of course Zak would have to want to go to Toronto but from what I have heard he is open to offers.
I just hope we find out what is gale of and then we can plan and move on. Until then we are stuck
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
I don’t think he could be paid by anyone.
During the ban, I don’t believe he can be employed by a club. Paying him immediately makes him an employee, even if the payment is only considered as some kind of ‘retainer’.
No club would be daft enough to risk non-compliance with a WADA ruling.
During the ban, I don’t believe he can be employed by a club. Paying him immediately makes him an employee, even if the payment is only considered as some kind of ‘retainer’.
No club would be daft enough to risk non-compliance with a WADA ruling.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2986
- Joined: 21 Dec 2014, 00:40
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
There are ways around anything as far as hiding numbers are concerned. Perez could employ him privately as his cleaner at homenottinghamtiger wrote:I don’t think he could be paid by anyone.
During the ban, I don’t believe he can be employed by a club. Paying him immediately makes him an employee, even if the payment is only considered as some kind of ‘retainer’.
No club would be daft enough to risk non-compliance with a WADA ruling.
-
- Championship Player
- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 11 Jul 2006, 16:17
- Contact:
Re: Hardaker
Absolutely not. WADA have very stringent rules that suspended players and clubs have to adhere to, and not doing so can have very serious consequences for both. Just to recap the rules:derbystiger wrote:There are ways around anything as far as hiding numbers are concerned. Perez could employ him privately as his cleaner at homenottinghamtiger wrote:I don’t think he could be paid by anyone.
During the ban, I don’t believe he can be employed by a club. Paying him immediately makes him an employee, even if the payment is only considered as some kind of ‘retainer’.
No club would be daft enough to risk non-compliance with a WADA ruling.
“During a period of Ineligibility individuals shall not be permitted to participate in any capacity in a Competition, Event or other activity (other than authorised anti-doping education or rehabilitation programmes) organised, convened or authorised by:
• the RFL or any body that is a member of, or affiliated to, or licensed by the RFL;
• any Signatory;
• any club or other body that is a member of, or affiliated to, or licensed by, a Signatory or a
Signatory’s member organisation;
• any professional league or any international or national-level Event organisation; or
• any elite or national-level sporting activity funded by a governmental agency.”
He can’t be employed by anyone directly associated with any club that is a member of the RFL, nor and organisation affiliated to any club.
The word ‘affiliated’ is a bit murky, but I think a club would be making a big mistake if he worked for a sponsor too. They are deemed to be affiliates for salary-cap purposes (although they are RFL regulations rather than WADA ones) and sponsors cannot make direct payments to players (as Salford found out in the case with Tony Puletua). It woud be hard to argue that a company that provides sponsorship to a club is not ‘affiliated’ to the club simply through the commercial agreement between them. It would also be hard to argue that the club had not “organised, convened or authorised” this to happen.
If he’s banned, WADA have more or less made sure he cannot he paid by any organition, or one of their affiliates, during his suspension.
It would be a massive risk for any club to even try it. WADA have the power to ban nations from competitions. To them a rugby league club is small fry.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests