Page 10 of 13

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:12 pm
by cogito ergo sum
Max n paddy wrote:Still mixed on the subject, he’s obviously not a strong person who can say no or no to his mates ! Bit of me frustrated, I don’t blame him completely for the loss tbh but my biggest gripe is why o why couldn’t he wait a few years while his career was over, then he could have taken as much talc as he wanted.

Top and bottom of it is that he's thick, with no sense of consequence about his choices.

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2017 8:50 am
by JIN JER
Max n paddy wrote:Still mixed on the subject, he’s obviously not a strong person who can say no or no to his mates ! Bit of me frustrated, I don’t blame him completely for the loss tbh but my biggest gripe is why o why couldn’t he wait a few years while his career was over, then he could have taken as much talc as he wanted.

Why not wait a couple of weeks till after the GF? At least then he'd have had eight weeks out of competition, that's why my opinion of him is arrogance, he thought he could get away with it.

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 22, 2017 9:34 am
by bane73
This also tells you the low level of his friends when they probably indulge and encourage his participation in the taking of the idiot powder. Zak seriously needs to look at them and ask himself if they’re worth throwing his career away for, if, the answers yes then jog on and enjoy your life in the gutter. People I know strive to make something of themselves, but, I’ve never known anyone who wants to make an idiot of themselves, and, so publicly too.

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 5:55 pm
by old cas lass
Former Dewsbury Rams player Donald Kudangirana has been banned from all sport for 3 years 7 seven months (until 29/8/2020) following a positive drugs test. He was provisionally suspended on 30/1/2017.


If Zak’s suspension takes this long , he’s gonna be waiting a long time for his out come.
Ridiculous.

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 6:03 pm
by TT Tiger
Ryan Bailey has had his ban overturned

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 6:16 pm
by cogito ergo sum
TT Tiger wrote:Ryan Bailey has had his ban overturned

Too thick to get the needle in!

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 6:48 pm
by tigerfeat
Jake livermore who was in the headlines last night after some idiot made a shocking remark to him is a interesting case where mitigating circumstancee led to a drugs ban not being sancitoned

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:16 pm
by nottinghamtiger
tigerfeat wrote:Jake livermore who was in the headlines last night after some idiot made a shocking remark to him is a interesting case where mitigating circumstancee led to a drugs ban not being sancitoned


In Jake Livermore’s case, he had clear evidence of severe depression and mental health difficulties due to the death of his child 12 months before his positive test.
He took cocaine immediately following the inquest that found the death of his child was avoidable.

Unless there is something we don’t know about, Zak’s case isn’t comparable.

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:26 pm
by Casmoley
nottinghamtiger wrote:
tigerfeat wrote:Jake livermore who was in the headlines last night after some idiot made a shocking remark to him is a interesting case where mitigating circumstancee led to a drugs ban not being sancitoned


In Jake Livermore’s case, he had clear evidence of severe depression and mental health difficulties due to the death of his child 12 months before his positive test.
He took cocaine immediately following the inquest that found the death of his child was avoidable.

Unless there is something we don’t know about, Zak’s case isn’t comparable.



Zak has had personal issues, but this was a issue that lead to him leaving Leeds. It's not something I'd want to happen to anyone. No excuse for what he did over a year later though.

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:31 pm
by nottinghamtiger
Casmoley wrote:
nottinghamtiger wrote:
tigerfeat wrote:Jake livermore who was in the headlines last night after some idiot made a shocking remark to him is a interesting case where mitigating circumstancee led to a drugs ban not being sancitoned


In Jake Livermore’s case, he had clear evidence of severe depression and mental health difficulties due to the death of his child 12 months before his positive test.
He took cocaine immediately following the inquest that found the death of his child was avoidable.

Unless there is something we don’t know about, Zak’s case isn’t comparable.



Zak has had personal issues, but this was a issue that lead to him leaving Leeds. It's not something I'd want to happen to anyone. No excuse for what he did over a year later though.


If he’d tested positive in the immediately following this issue he may have had an argument. But as you say, not over a year later.
He’s more likely to get off like Bailey.

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:31 pm
by tigerfeat
I know all about the jake livermore case tragic one it was indeed im saying if a ban is immopsed on hardaker there will be a appeal citing mitigating circumstances im not judge and jury just telling you what will happen

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:09 pm
by gateman
Can anyone shed any light on why it is taking so long before ZAK is in front of the powers that be ?? It seems ages since Walker from Wakefield was tested positive he as not been up as yet, It seems far from fare to keep the defendants and every other person with a vested interest waiting

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:44 pm
by the machine
gateman wrote:Can anyone shed any light on why it is taking so long before ZAK is in front of the powers that be ?? It seems ages since Walker from Wakefield was tested positive he as not been up as yet, It seems far from fare to keep the defendants and every other person with a vested interest waiting


You need a hobby lol

We'll find out when we find out

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:54 pm
by gateman
the machine wrote:
gateman wrote:Can anyone shed any light on why it is taking so long before ZAK is in front of the powers that be ?? It seems ages since Walker from Wakefield was tested positive he as not been up as yet, It seems far from fare to keep the defendants and every other person with a vested interest waiting


You need a hobby lol


We'll find out when we find out


accept my apologies matey for asking a question it was not meant to upset anyone

Re: Zak's return?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2018 9:18 pm
by the machine
gateman wrote:
the machine wrote:
gateman wrote:Can anyone shed any light on why it is taking so long before ZAK is in front of the powers that be ?? It seems ages since Walker from Wakefield was tested positive he as not been up as yet, It seems far from fare to keep the defendants and every other person with a vested interest waiting


You need a hobby lol


We'll find out when we find out


accept my apologies matey for asking a question it was not meant to upset anyone


You've certainly not upset anyone let alone me don't worry about that lol

Sooner the season starts the better ey lol