19 for hudds

[jackknife]

Eden
Minikin
Webster
Shenton
Monaghan
Chase
McShane
Lynch
Milner
Springer
SJL
Foster/Larroyer
Massey

Millington
Moors
Cook
T.Holmes

Gill foster/Larroyer

Id choose Foster over Larroyer just because of the potential, Larroyer has been around sl before and not really been more that a squad player, Foster is stil young and could turn into a great find (or he couldn't)

[old cas lass]

Eden
Minikin
Webster
Shenton
Monaghan
Chase
McShane
Lynch
Milner
Springer
SJL
Foster/Larroyer
Massey

Millington
Moors
Cook
T.Holmes

Gill foster/Larroyer

Id choose Foster over Larroyer just because of the potential, Larroyer has been around sl before and not really been more that a squad player, Foster is stil young and could turn into a great find (or he couldn't)

That team looks more than capable of beating Huddersfield.
Some are raving about them beating Leeds.
I saw the game and both teams were poor.
Leeds in fact were dire.

[gateman]

It as been posted that it is a big step up from championship to super league , but were else can a player step up from its either under 19S or championship, if we do not try these lads that have been out on loan loaning them out as been a pointless exercise

[old cas lass]

Just seen the club are taking 13 buses tomorrow, it's gonna be another great away day from the fans.


Also a post on twitter, junior moors a doubt.

[Robbo]

Apologies Robbo. I have been busy outside of Casforum.

First of all, let's address the elephant in the room that we're approaching this from two different angles. I'm extremely positive and back the club, and also believe the development will 100% happen.

You have a half-empty attitude and constantly ridicule the club at every opportunity and believe you can do better. You also are very skeptical about anything the club does and the development as a whole. Moreover, you come in with a vested interest of having your own business, which understandably you want to prioritise. However, it clouds your judgement too.

What I would suggest is that Lateral are being very conservative. They have to be. It's clear from their statement they don't want to overpromise. That being said, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest that there is more than meets the eye to this situation. You, I, nor anyone else on here knows where the land lies, nor have we seen any of the contractual information. It's a guessing game from our standpoint.

However, what information I have passed on is already out there in the public domain. People can interpret it how they want. There's no spin, there's no manipulation of the truth. I could be wrong, I could be right. Either way, I'm fully confident the development will happen and I'm confident that "2020" wouldn't have been mentioned unless they were absolutely certain it was going to happen by the end of 2020.

In relation to funding, it's pretty clear that a lot of the planning hurdles had to be resolved before they could push on with the pension provider. You wouldn't throw out a load of cash if there wasn't the interest there, nor that it would make sense from an investment point of view that you were guaranteed to get your cash back. A lot of those have been resolved and a few more planning points are currently in situ.

Either way, groundworks are going to begin and so is coal extraction.

Deflection Hudd does not work. You are not a politician.
I have always supported the club both financially and as a fan. You supported RW when it was clear that we were in big trouble. I stood to my guns and brought about change which TBH ruined my friendship with JF but it had to be done.

I want the best for the club but I demand honesty and I am too old to buy spin. You are clearly part of the machine that throws out "what fans want to know". Amazing how certain news is out in an hour ,but other things are not.
Most fans are grown up and can form an opinion. After the debacle of last time they are right to be worried.
I note now buried in yet another go at me we are moving to the end of 2020 !! So as the season finishes in September you actually mean for the 2021 season. Correct?
I picked you up on "all funding was in place" Which now you rather reluctantly say is incorrect.
Robbo

[dettoriman]

If Junior Moors doesn't play, We'd be in trouble.

Huddersfield have quality running through the spine of their team and we'll struggle to beat them.

For me. Eden has to play Full Back, The position he was signed for. Tom Holmes has to play 7, if not it was a pointless exercise loaning him out and the subsequently recalling him. Larroyer should start.

[Fat Nige]

If Junior Moors doesn't play, We'd be in trouble.

Huddersfield have quality running through the spine of their team and we'll struggle to beat them.

For me. Eden has to play Full Back, The position he was signed for. Tom Holmes has to play 7, if not it was a pointless exercise loaning him out and the subsequently recalling him. Larroyer should start.

After reading forum for ages, finally decided to join up. Totally agree that holmes has to play 7 with Eden at fb. Eden was signed initially to play there and will be a threat there in attack. Tom is a decent player that IS a hb. Macca did a good job filling in there last season, but was very poor there at Hull following gale going off. Against Wigan, in his correct position he was back to his best. Leave as many as possible in their best position for this game. We're already several key players missing.
Disagree about Huddersfield having a quality spine tho. One halfback, two average hookers and a fb that looks absolutely dire defensively. Still should have way too much for them if squad is as strong as we've been led to believe.

[nottinghamtiger]

Leave as much as we can as it is.
Monaghan to come in at full back.
Holmes to play at 7.
Holmes or another forward to replace McMeekan.

[Sharlotiger]

FB - Eden
W - Monaghan
C - Webster
C - Shenton
W - Minikin
SO - Chase
SH - McShane
PR - Lynch
HK - Milner
PR - Springer
SR - Foster / Moors
SR - JSL
LF - Massey

SUB - Millington
SUB - Moors / Foster
SUB - Cook
SUB - T Holmes

Gill and Larroyer to miss out for me.

I think we will be seeing Milner and McShane play 80 mins each. Starting with either Foster or Moors dependant on if DP is wanting the impact off the bench.

Roberts to make a miraculous recover on Wednesday and get selected?

Why should Foster come into the side in front of Laroyer?. Foster as been out injured and as played the odd game at Oxford where as a quality SL player like Laroyer as been getting back to fitness at Bradford.

[Sharlotiger]

just on the basis of foster taking part in the warm up against wigan I think he'll be in the 17.

Be a little hard for Larroyer to take part in it when he was keeping up his match fitness with the Bulls down in Toluose.

[HuddsTigers]

Moors is in the pictures with the lads training from today.

Can't be that much of a doubt.

[old cas lass]

Moors is in the pictures with the lads training from today.

Can't be that much of a doubt.

Mind games .

[HuddsTigers]

If there were any injury concerns, i don't think he'd be taking part in 13 v 13 contact session (or alike).

Clearly from today as Larroyer and Million are pictured too.

[lurcher]

just on the basis of foster taking part in the warm up against wigan I think he'll be in the 17.

Be a little hard for Larroyer to take part in it when he was keeping up his match fitness with the Bulls down in Toluose.

I meant powell seemed to be getting him used to the pre match preparation.

[takethetwo]

Leave as much as we can as it is.
Monaghan to come in at full back.
Holmes to play at 7.
Holmes or another forward to replace McMeekan.

Definitely not , a full back not only needs to be able play the position (as in directing the halfbacks and the play he ball ) but also needs the pace to cover the width of the field for the full 80 . With the way we play anyone will score on the wing , like Milner at Catalans last year . Eden must play FB .

[fords]

Moors is in the pictures with the lads training from today.

Can't be that much of a doubt.

Exactly , so no idea where that post on twitter has come from ....

[gateman]

Before ZAC came available we had signed EDEN to replace Dorn at full back , for me this Thursday that's were he should play, Monagan or Gill on the wing,

[Flat Capper]

Before ZAC came available we had signed EDEN to replace Dorn at full back , for me this Thursday that's were he should play, Monagan or Gill on the wing,

Correct - it's fairly simple really - you play the career wingers on the wing and the career full-back at, err, full-back. Not rocket science.

[derbystiger]

Before ZAC came available we had signed EDEN to replace Dorn at full back , for me this Thursday that's were he should play, Monagan or Gill on the wing,

Correct - it's fairly simple really - you play the career wingers on the wing and the career full-back at, err, full-back. Not rocket science.

Fairly simple to me too. Try telling our national coach that whose just named Zac as centre! Unbelievable!

[TT Tiger]

Before ZAC came available we had signed EDEN to replace Dorn at full back , for me this Thursday that's were he should play, Monagan or Gill on the wing,

Correct - it's fairly simple really - you play the career wingers on the wing and the career full-back at, err, full-back. Not rocket science.

Fairly simple to me too. Try telling our national coach that whose just named Zac as centre! Unbelievable!

I'm sure Eden has been playing on the wing for the last 3 seasons?