Luke gale
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 753
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 09:57
- Contact:
Re: Luke gale
Doesnt matter anyway. Even if he didnt use it, he no longer can use it anyway.
-
- League One Player
- Posts: 2986
- Joined: 21 Dec 2014, 00:40
- Contact:
Re: Luke gale
Agree with that. I wonder why you can't carry them over though?Normy-Tiger wrote:Doesnt matter anyway. Even if he didnt use it, he no longer can use it anyway.
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 753
- Joined: 31 Jan 2016, 09:57
- Contact:
Re: Luke gale
Do it once they give you benefit of doibt and offer EGP. On your second offense you should have learnt your lesson so its no longer possible to use.
- Flat Capper
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 00:10
- Location: Where ever I lay my fat
- Contact:
Re: Luke gale
But what happens if you don't use it because you were not found guilty of an offence, surely you can still use it at a later date?Normy-Tiger wrote:Do it once they give you benefit of doibt and offer EGP. On your second offense you should have learnt your lesson so its no longer possible to use.
Spreading the Cas gene pool
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1676
- Joined: 20 Jun 2016, 08:47
- Contact:
Re: Luke gale
If the RL offer an early guilty plea, guilt is established. You cannot be found not guilty of something you admit guilt to. He was guilty of touching the ref, we all saw it. No further action means it's done with. If they had thought he was not guilty, then "no charge" would have appeared, not Grade A.
Re: Luke gale
"The following players have have taken the option of an early guilty plea"...how is it written then because that's pretty clear to me?fast hands wrote:Don't think so Fumper, not how it's written.old cas lass wrote:Not sure, that was on the RFL site.Fumper27 wrote:He used his EGPold cas lass wrote:No further action.
Put on by them.
- Flat Capper
- Grand Final Winner
- Posts: 15173
- Joined: 06 Jul 2006, 00:10
- Location: Where ever I lay my fat
- Contact:
Re: Luke gale
Apologies for assumptions but I've not trawled through the RFL website to look at everything and relied on links put on here in which I have not seen:-cogito ergo sum wrote:If the RL offer an early guilty plea, guilt is established. You cannot be found not guilty of something you admit guilt to. He was guilty of touching the ref, we all saw it. No further action means it's done with. If they had thought he was not guilty, then "no charge" would have appeared, not Grade A.
a) Luke Gale charged with any offence
b) Luke Gale appearing before the disciplinary panel
c) Luke Gale pleading guilty
c) Any mention of EGP
I simply came to the conclusion that as no comments on what may have happened in the process were found, the RFL had actually just decided the incident was not significant enough to warrant further comment or indeed, inclusion in the disciplinary process publications.
Spreading the Cas gene pool
-
- Academy Player
- Posts: 1676
- Joined: 20 Jun 2016, 08:47
- Contact:
Re: Luke gale
Frustrating thing is that many of us saw it coming, but Luke didn't.
Mind you, from the ref's reaction to a tap to draw his attention, you would have thought Luke tasered him!
I don't think that Luke losing his EGP is that significant, he normally behaves.
Mind you, from the ref's reaction to a tap to draw his attention, you would have thought Luke tasered him!
I don't think that Luke losing his EGP is that significant, he normally behaves.
Re: Luke gale
The RFL have opened a can of worms Luke Gale put his hand on the refs arm whilst having a conversation, something what go's on every day
Then you have the Grix, and the Widnes player poleaxe the ref and get off scott free. Everyone who ever played or watched RL, know the ref is their to do a job, and should be respected by the players, but they're not Gods. It's time common sense came back into the game
Then you have the Grix, and the Widnes player poleaxe the ref and get off scott free. Everyone who ever played or watched RL, know the ref is their to do a job, and should be respected by the players, but they're not Gods. It's time common sense came back into the game
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 31 guests