new ground

tigerforever · Post by **tigerforever** » 03 Mar 2016, 16:27

According to the Cas & Ponte Express the council have rejected Laterals latest submission to vary the scheme - god knows where that leaves us.

yorky · Post by **yorky** » 03 Mar 2016, 16:33

tigerforever wrote:According to the Cas & Ponte Express the council have rejected Laterals latest submission to vary the scheme - god knows where that leaves us.

here we go, what are the variations Lateral want & why would the council reject them when they were so behind the scheme. York city & York knights have had the same problem with the main contractors altering the plans etc.
perhaps its time for an update from lateral or some questions at the "meet the directors" night ???

lurcher · Post by **lurcher** » 03 Mar 2016, 23:36

they wanted to build a number of smaller retail units which the council thought would impact negatively on the town centre.they were only suggested amendments from lateral who have now withdrawn the suggested amendments. we still have m+s primark and next signed up.

yorky · Post by **yorky** » 03 Mar 2016, 23:52

lurcher wrote:they wanted to build a number of smaller retail units which the council thought would impact negatively on the town centre.they were only suggested amendments from lateral who have now withdrawn the suggested amendments. we still have m+s primark and next signed up.

thanks lurcher so it still full steam ahead.

tigerforever · Post by **tigerforever** » 04 Mar 2016, 01:13

lurcher wrote:they wanted to build a number of smaller retail units which the council thought would impact negatively on the town centre.they were only suggested amendments from lateral who have now withdrawn the suggested amendments. we still have m+s primark and next signed up.

Whilst that is correct I am not sure its quite as simple as you say. The reason they wanted the change was that no one is interested in taking food space in the original with all the supermarkets struggling. So they now are left with something they cannot let so will have to come up with another idea but this could delay everything again as far as I can see.

lurcher · Post by **lurcher** » 04 Mar 2016, 02:10

not sure it matters anyway as far as i know they have to build the stadium first.

Tamworth Tiger · Post by **Tamworth Tiger** » 04 Mar 2016, 03:24

They won't build anything if they can't make it stack up financially

The Firm · Post by **The Firm** » 04 Mar 2016, 08:08

Tamworth Tiger wrote:They won't build anything if they can't make it stack up financially

Exactly, whilst they have to build the stadium first they don't have to build anything until the contracts are signed and sealed on enough of the site to financially enable it to happen. So should not enough companies sign on the dotted line then the stadium, along with everything else, doesn't get built.

Jungle Man · Post by **Jungle Man** » 04 Mar 2016, 09:11

I can't make the "meet the Directors" night, but it goes without saying, that I am sure the people are, will be asking for an update from both parties on the latest situation and if the withdrawal of the proposed amendments has put the project further back.

tigerfeat · Post by **tigerfeat** » 12 Mar 2016, 11:39

theres pictures on facebook of what the new stand will look like model been the chesterfield football ground

TheSheriff · Post by **TheSheriff** » 12 Mar 2016, 18:32

tigerfeat wrote:theres pictures on facebook of what the new stand will look like model been the chesterfield football ground

Wasn't Chesterfield being the model the old Waystone site? The new one is meant to be like Rotherham?

Or have I got things mixed up/plans have changed?

tigerfeat · Post by **tigerfeat** » 12 Mar 2016, 18:37

I thought they were new pictures put on Facebook by steve gill apologies if ive got it wrong

HuddsTigers · Post by **HuddsTigers** » 12 Mar 2016, 19:06

TheSheriff wrote:
tigerfeat wrote:theres pictures on facebook of what the new stand will look like model been the chesterfield football ground
Wasn't Chesterfield being the model the old Waystone site? The new one is meant to be like Rotherham?

Or have I got things mixed up/plans have changed?

You're mixed up.

The club went to a number of different stadia for Waystone but they have always had good links with Chesterfield. They went down to view Chesterfield's on Friday again and to see how they did their hospitality.

lurcher · Post by **lurcher** » 12 Mar 2016, 20:06

the same firm that built rotherams ground are building ours so i think people are assuming the will be the same.

alcasfan · Post by **alcasfan** » 13 Mar 2016, 09:54

lurcher wrote:the same firm that built rotherams ground are building ours so i think people are assuming the will be the same.

Rotherham's Stadium cost £20 million. The CAS ground will be a lot less !

lurcher · Post by **lurcher** » 17 May 2016, 23:49

some pics on face book. ground works have started.

yorky · Post by **yorky** » 18 May 2016, 07:59

lurcher wrote:some pics on face book. ground works have started.

good news, but do you have a link as i cant find it.

old cas lass · Post by **old cas lass** » 18 May 2016, 09:29

yorky wrote:
lurcher wrote:some pics on face book. ground works have started.
good news, but do you have a link as i cant find it.

There's one on the castleford tiger fans forum on Facebook.

yorky · Post by **yorky** » 18 May 2016, 09:36

thanks OCL, just had a look & at last we have some movement.

Tigerade · Post by **Tigerade** » 18 May 2016, 10:15

Excellent news. This should be in the C & P Express on Thursday.

Casforum • The Leading Castleford Tigers Community

new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Re: new ground

Who is online