Welcome back Alf, but why would you troll through my post of over 3 years to mae a totally irrelevant point and what on earth has the Rangi incident of more than 3 years ago, got to do with yesterday?alftupper wrote:what a hysterical one eyed rant, even by yours and this forums standards, particularly when compared to what you had to say following Rangi Chase' premeditated attack on Ropati that destroyed his face. In case you have forgotten this was your take on it at the time;Danny Boy wrote:I'm sure the touch judge came on waving his flag at the time, but BentHam apparently deemed it a fair challenge, which says it all, I still can't believe the RFL only rate it grade B, they should have thrown the book at the cynical thug.Aid wrote:So how is possible that none of the match officials, I ref, 2 touch judges and I In goal judge saw anything wrong with the attack on Gale?
Warrington were very clever at slowing down the ruck, or should I say that BentHam was either very poor at spotting it or deliberately ignored their transgressions.
If there's any justice, Westwood would be made to miss the next Warrington game against us, as it was ultimately his actions that significatly contributed to our downfall, by taking out our key playmaker.
'I can't see Rangi getting a ban, it wasn't a dirty or dangerous tackle'
it's hard to read with a straight face, no pun intended Tangi
a completely irrational mind or the most blinkered Cas fan on here which takes some doing, I can't decide.
...but to answer your not very well made point Rangi's attack was definitely not premeditated, it was a typical Rangi tackle, just trying for a big hit which was clumsy and very badly executed although Ropati was in posession and expecting to be tackled at the time but it was wishful thinking that he wouldn't get a ban, but Alf, what do expect on a Casforum? maybe you should stick to your own forum and read things about your own club or maybe get back under that stone?
The difference was that Gale had already passed the ball and the thug playing for Warrington stiff armed him, very late and it's more good luck than management that Luke's jaw or cheekbone wasn't smashed.
Westwood has only been charged with grade B, so the maximum ban can only be 2 games, whereas Rangi was given a 3 game ban (which on reflection, he probably deserved), but Westwood's was far worse and he should have been charged with a grade D.